Kind of getting tired of gorgeous rainbows every day, ones without a lot of rain here in The Heights. But, here they are again:
Upwind Cumulonimbus clouds faded as the trudged toward Catalinaland yesterday, bottoms evaporating, raining out, leaving only a big patch Altostratus cumulonimbogenitus way up (at least ten kft above the ground) there with rain drops just big enough to survive evaporation and reach the ground just before 3 PM.
In the meantime, all the excitement, possibly spurred by the gusty outflow winds that accompanied the above seen, was happening almost overhead to the NW-NE, as a great line of Cumulus bases blackened. They were already passed us, but if they unloaded and sent a pulse of wind out and toward us, then we might end up in a wind clash zone, with huge clouds forming overhead. OK, was dreaming again, but here’s what was going on, which ultimately led to another major dump on the CDO watershed.
Hiked over to see if the Sutherland Wash, east of the similarly named housing development, Sutherland Heights, had a good flow from our “Mighty Kong” of prior day. It had:
The weather ahead
Seems Remnant Roslyn will spit out another snippet of moisture ahead of our fall-like cold front passage late Sunday or early Monday bringing clouds, and with clouds, a slight chance of measurable rain. Don’t hold your breath for measurable rain IMO. Hope I’m as wrong as the prediction I made to a friend that the Stanford Cardinal would trounce the wildly overrated Washington Huskies fubball team last night.
The End.
2 thoughts on “Another day, another rainbow, another trace of rain; ho-hum”
May not be relevant to Catalina, but re your prior work at UW in cloud-seeding. There were experiments much earlier than you noted, in the PNW. E of the E-slope of the Cascades in NCentralOR, may have been in the late ’50s. Poor results, partly because any upslope is minor. Firm doing the study then tried to switch gears and sell hail prediction services…
Yep, I think you’re right about this.
I even had that report at one time (maybe Bob Beaumont was in charge?), but now that report has been shipped off to the U of WA library and scanned by them. They have a fairly large collection of “gray literature”, non-peer reviewed Final Reports from quite a few cloud seeding companies. I think one of those sets is that from Project Cirrus by Vonnegut and Schaefer in the late 1940.
I collected them during my career at the U of WA.
Gee, just now looked it up and here it is, AND Bob Beaumont was the lead author!
May not be relevant to Catalina, but re your prior work at UW in cloud-seeding. There were experiments much earlier than you noted, in the PNW. E of the E-slope of the Cascades in NCentralOR, may have been in the late ’50s. Poor results, partly because any upslope is minor. Firm doing the study then tried to switch gears and sell hail prediction services…
Yep, I think you’re right about this.
I even had that report at one time (maybe Bob Beaumont was in charge?), but now that report has been shipped off to the U of WA library and scanned by them. They have a fairly large collection of “gray literature”, non-peer reviewed Final Reports from quite a few cloud seeding companies. I think one of those sets is that from Project Cirrus by Vonnegut and Schaefer in the late 1940.
I collected them during my career at the U of WA.
Gee, just now looked it up and here it is, AND Bob Beaumont was the lead author!
http://westernwaters.org/record/view/142011
art