“The Ghost of Perlucidus” (along with some history)

On a movie-sounding title theme again today, or this title could be the title of a bedtime story for kids, one that alludes to the Greek citizen bee keeper, Perlucidus, due to his early work in distributing hives, honey and honeycombs.  Some cloud patterns resemble honeycombs, and so when Luke Howard decided to create a Latin system of names for clouds around 1802-03, he wanted to pay homage to Perlucidus1.    Yesterday morning we had Altocumulus perlucidus and those clouds are discussed in detail below the lengthy “historic learning module” below.

——historic learning module————

Our Latin cloud naming system follows the tradition of Latin names first established in the hard sciences like botany and biology.  After they did their naming thing, we weather folk decided, under leadership of Luke Howard, to “join the club”, to sound like the other scientists of the day when we were talkin’ clouds, that is, pretend to be on as solid a foundation as, say botanists,  whom we likely envied,  by creating a similar Latin naming system for clouds.  That would show them!

Unfortunately, we really didn’t know what clouds had in them in those days, there were no aircraft measurements. Were they ice clouds or liquid droplet clouds, a mixture of both?  And so the naming system that was developed came out a little fuzzy; flawed really.  I guess “fuzzy” is appropriate for clouds.  As the singer said, “I really don’t know clouds at all2.”

OK, after that “side lobe”…an example of fuzziness and flaws in our names:  while Stratus and Altostratus have virtually the same name, and can look VERY similar on occasion, one (Stratus) is completely composed of droplets, and the other (Altostratus) is almost always completely composed of ice particles and snowflakes (aggregates of ice crystals, bunches locked together).  No doubt Howard saw the visual resemblance from the ground, and may have thought they were composed of the same stuff.

Yet, from the name of Altostratus, you would think it is a droplet cloud like Stratus, but just located at a higher level (“alto” meaning “high” in Latin).  Even our scientists confuse Altostratus in their peer-reviewed papers with something else because of this naming problem.  A better name, since Altostratus is full of ice precipitation (unknown when Howard was making up his names, of course) would have been, “Altonimbostratus”.  Nimbostratus, by definition, is a precipitating layer cloud, too.

Another problem in our naming system is that unlike in botany, where a redwood tree does not become a pine tree over time, clouds are always morphing into new forms.

And then we have to come up with silly expressions such as “Altostratus opacus cumulonimbomutatus”, what might pass for the remains of a Cumulonimbus cloud that has lost its base and only the heavy, higher level ice-cloud anvil (Altostratus) remains.

So, as Howard was attempting to follow the Latin scientific naming conventions of the day for clouds, up popped the descriptor, “perlucidus” for clouds patterned like a honeycomb in homage to Perlucidus1.

Two cloud genera (there are TEN3-I really like footnotes. They give a piece a really erudite feel even when its not), have the descriptor, perlucidus attached to them because they can attain a honeycomb pattern.  These are Stratocumulus and Altocumulus, to repeat.

——-End of historic learning module———–

Yesterday we had some very cold Altocumulus perlucidus, some cloud elements shedding ice and disappearing because of it.  The TUS morning sounding indicated these were in the range of -25 to -27 C.  Here’s what these clouds looked like when they were still mainly composed of liquid droplets:

7:29 AM.  Classic Altocumulus perlucidus (honey-combed pattern)
7:29 AM. Classic Altocumulus perlucidus (honey-combed pattern) with fine veils of ice crystals falling from many of the droplet cloud elements.

 

9:15 AM. Here, in brighter light, one can see the droplet clouds at left, while there are patchy, hazy regions in between. Those are the ice crystal remains, "ghosts" of the perlucidus cloud elements that have completely changed into ice (glaciated).
9:15 AM. Here, in brighter light, one can see the droplet clouds at left, while there are patchy, hazy regions in between. Those are the ice crystal remains, “ghosts” of the perlucidus cloud elements that have completely changed into ice (glaciated).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9:24 AM.  Ovalized shot of the icy ghosts of perlucidus.
9:24 AM. Ovalized shot of the icy ghosts of perlucidus.  There really is no cloud name for this grouping.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Strange Brew yesterday

There were also some very strange looking lower clouds as dry convection, associated with that little warming we had yesterday afternoon during this historic cold wave, bulged upward into a pretty moist laminar stable layer that resisted like heck being pushed up.   When it was pushed up by that convection, which with greater moistness you would have seen as small Cumulus, instead you got slivers of clouds on  top of where the Cumulus should have been.  Those slivers of moist air that just reached the condensation level where droplets form in the air sliding over the top of the “invisible Cumulus.”  The result, these odd forms shown below, resembling lenticular clouds with ragged bottoms in some cases:

12:15 PM.  This dome shaped oddity.  Was only there for a minute or two.  Jumped out of car to get it.  I hope your happy.
12:15 PM. This dome shaped oddity. Was only there for a minute or two. Jumped out of car to get it. I hope your happy.
12:38 PM.  Then over the Catalinas, these strange forms of lenticularis clouds.
12:38 PM. Then over the Catalinas, these strange forms of lenticularis clouds likely forced by dry convection rising up from underneath.

The last photo of a band of Stratocumulus with a ton of ice in it is worthy of a comment.  A few days ago, the models had this day having significant precip, precip that would have been snow, followed by the same vast clearing we had later yesterday.  Imagine last night  and this morning’s cooling air augmented by a snow cover!   Yikes.  Woulda been 5 degree colder than what is already a pipe bustin’ cold morning.  Wouldn’t have had so much afternoon melting because the ground has been chilled for several days now.

Wishing you happy pipes this morning.  They’re freezing up here, temperature now 22.x here.

BTW, the list of Arizona low record temperatures will grow substantially today, as if you didn’t know it.

The weather ahead?  Warmer.  Can it be otherwise?

Also at 12:38 PM, looking farther down the Catalinas.  Strange indeed.
Also at 12:38 PM, looking farther down the Catalinas. Strange indeed.
1:23 PM.  The end of the clouds was at hand when this band heavily glactiating Stratocumulus clouds came over.  Some flurries could be seen falling on Mt. Lemmon.
1:23 PM. The end of the clouds was at hand when this band heavily glactiating and higher-than-normal-based Stratocumulus clouds came over. (The elements were too large to be Altocumulus.) Some flurries could be seen falling from these clouds on Mt. Lemmon at little later.

The End

——-

1Shockingly, this part has been completely made up.

2She also said, “Ice cream castles in the air”, followed by,  “Feathery canyons everywhere.”  And finally, “Clouds got in my way.”  (BTW, “Clouds got in my way”, too, as if you couldn’t tell!)

3The the ten are: Cumulus, Stratocumulus, Nimbostratus, Altostratus, Altocumulus, Stratus, Cirrus, Cirrostratus, Cirrocumulus, and the mighty most of the time, Cumulonimbus.

“The Seeds of Uncinus”; a review

Starring Justin Bieber as Harry Potter in the upcoming 12th Harry Potter movie, the musical….

(There, that should grab some attention.  But then people would be disappointed, maybe mad, but still they might see something here about Cirrus uncinus clouds that they didn’t know before.)

Had some great Cirrus uncinus clouds yesterday!  I was not thinking about uncinus at all yesterday, but rather amorphous blobs of Cirrus, but there they were.    Maybe you saw those “Ci unc” with their great tails hanging down, streaking across the sky.  And there was something “wrong”, too.

What was it?  Its rare when it happens.

The tails were going the “wrong” way, evident later in the day.   As streamers of crystals from the “head” of Ci unc trail out, the wind nearly always decreases going downward, and the tails fall back behind the head TOWARD the west, or toward whichever way the wind is blowing FROM.  Yesterday, the tails went in front of the head, a real odditity telling you the wind was a little stronger below the head.  Hope some of you logged that anomaly.  Its hard to get your CMJ T-shirt without having noticed that.

Some photos, too many, no doubt, but that’s what I do, and I’m quite good at it:

9:07.  "Angel's hair" passes to the south of Catalina.  Cirrus uncinus and Cirrus fibratus, maybe a thin layer of Cirrostratus above it.
9:07. “Angel’s hair” passes to the south of Catalina. Cirrus uncinus and Cirrus fibratus, maybe a thin layer of Cirrostratus above it. Note the long tails streaming away from Catalina (center).
9:21 AM.  Cirrus fibratus (no hook/tuft visible at top because you can't see it here) and Cirrus spissatus eject toward Catalina.  Just thought this was pretty, nothing to do with today's discussion.
9:21 AM. Cirrus fibratus (no hook/tuft visible at top because you can’t see it here) and Cirrus spissatus eject toward Catalina. Just thought this was pretty, nothing to do with today’s discussion.
12:38 PM.  Arrows all over in this mainly batch of Ci unc shows seed cloud specks that lead to them much later.
12:38 PM. Arrows all over in this mainly batch of Ci unc shows seed cloud specks that lead to them much later.
12:15 PM.  The heavier Cirrus forms have departed and these delicate ones were to dominate the rest of the day.  So pretty.  The hooky ones are Ci unc.
12:15 PM. The heavier Cirrus forms have departed and these delicate ones were to dominate the rest of the day. So pretty. The hooky ones are Ci unc.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

But how do these long-tailed Cirrus get that way? How do they start?

With seed clouds, cloud specks with tiny quasi-spherical ice crystals in them, sometimes the ice called “germs” because they’re so small, maybe 10-20 microns in size; tiny dots.

Next is a sequence showing the fleck seed cloud stage to the tail growing stage of Cirrus uncinus, in which the larger ice crystals start to fall out. Unfortunately, by the time the tail is as long as those seen in these shots, those original Cirrus fleck clouds might be a 100 miles away.

Now, is any of this information useful for everyday life?  Of course, not!  But, let’s say you get on Jeopardy, the TEEVEE program and you have chosen, “Clouds” as your category and the hose (oops, “host”, damn autospeller!) asks you, “This kind of ice crystal is found below the tops of CIrrus clouds.”

You’re answer from today’s “lesson”:

“What is a bullet rosette?”  Some kind of prize happens when you say that, and you’re happy for the first time that you read all this.

2:45 PM.  As the end of the Cirrus approached, as often happens, you get to see how they looked when they first formed, and here's a shot of that.
2:45 PM. As the end of the Cirrus approached, as often happens, you get to see how they looked when they first formed, and here’s a shot of that.
2:57 PM.  Its got writing on it.
2:57 PM, just 12 min later. Its got more writing on it.
3:07 PM, ten more minutes go by.  I was watching, standing there in a lot of cold air so I could get this sequence.  What were you doing?  Watching the Seahawks lose to Atlanta?
3:07 PM, ten more minutes go by, trails lengthen further. I was watching, standing there in a lot of cold air so I could get this sequence. What were you doing? Watching the Seahawks lose to Atlanta in the last 30 s of the game after they just had gone ahead? How could that happen? Its OK, I understand. Clouds don’t always come first for you.
3:19 PM.  Last one, was getting too far away.
3:19 PM. Last one, was getting too far away.
4:07 PM.  The afternoon finished out in an undercutting-the=Cirrus Cirrocumulus clouds, maybe Altocumulus lenticularis in the distance due to having shading.  Had some great, delicate patterns as well.
4:07 PM. The afternoon finished out in an undercutting-the=Cirrus Cirrocumulus clouds, maybe Altocumulus lenticularis in the distance due to having shading. Had some great, delicate patterns as well.
4:10 PM.  Cirrocumulus.  These are droplet clouds and did not form ice at any time.  They were lower and warmer than the Cirrus fleck clouds.  Shows how similar the formation process is of Cc and Ci, flecky, dotty, tiny updrafts, maybe 0.1 meters per second.
4:10 PM. Cirrocumulus. These are droplet clouds and did not form ice at any time. They were lower and warmer than the Cirrus fleck clouds. Shows how similar the formation process is of Cc and Ci, flecky, dotty, tiny updrafts, maybe 0.1 meters per second or less updraft forms them.

 

Today’s clouds?

COLD, cold trough going over us again today and this evening. Air should moisten up some in the lower levels as this happens allowing for some Cumulus to form, ones likely to develop a little ice in them, which means a little virga here and there is likely. There are also likely to be a couple of Altocumulus or higher based Stratocumulus patches, too, during the day. U of A has predicted soundings over TUS here.

The weather ahead

Temperature extremes pattern still ahead in just a few days now; warm in the West, darn cold in the East.  Rain has shown up here on the afternoon of the 27th in last evening’s 5 PM AST global data model run.

Speaking of extremes

A number of low temperature (not “cold” temperature) records have been broken in AZ.  Here are a few, as reported by the NWS.  Some of these records that were broken go back 100 years, such as the 7 F at Wilcox, set two days ago, breaking the 8 F in 1913, the same time as when the TUS low temperature record was set.  The two patterns must have been similar, 1913 and now.  Makes you feel special, doesn’t it?

SXUS75 KFGZ 140119
RERFGZ
RECORD EVENT REPORT
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE FLAGSTAFF, AZ
600 PM MST SUN JAN 13 2013
...RECORD LOW HIGH TEMPERATURES FOR NORTHERN ARIZONA ON JAN 13 2013...
CITY (PERIOD OF RECORD)          NEW LOW HIGH    PREVIOUS RECORD/YEAR
GRAND CANYON NP N RIM (1926 - 2013)    11          16         IN  2007
PAYSON (1949 - 2013)                   33          35         IN  1960
...RECORD LOW TEMPERATURES FOR NORTHERN ARIZONA ON JAN 13 2013...
CITY (PERIOD OF RECORD)            NEW LOW       PREVIOUS RECORD/YEAR
FLAGSTAFF (1899 - 2013)                -7          -6         IN  1963
GRAND CANYON NP N RIM (1926 - 2013)   -12          -5         IN  1926
THESE RECORDS ARE PRELIMINARY PENDING OFFICIAL REPORTS.
$$

SXUS75 KFGZ 132320
RERFGZ
RECORD EVENT REPORT
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE FLAGSTAFF, AZ
1000 AM MST SUN JAN 13 2013
...RECORD LOW HIGH TEMPERATURES FOR NORTHERN ARIZONA ON JAN 12 2013...
CITY (PERIOD OF RECORD)          NEW LOW HIGH    PREVIOUS RECORD/YEAR
FORT VALLEY (1909 - 2013)              20          23         IN  1963
MCNARY 2N (1921 - 2013)                22          27         IN  1964
SUNSET CRATER NM (1970 - 2013)         21          25         IN  1985
...RECORD LOW TEMPERATURES FOR NORTHERN ARIZONA ON JAN 13 2013...
CITY (PERIOD OF RECORD)            NEW LOW       PREVIOUS RECORD/YEAR
FLAGSTAFF (1899 - 2013)                -7          -6         IN  1963
THESE RECORDS ARE PRELIMINARY PENDING OFFICIAL REPORTS.
$$

SXUS75 KTWC 131605 CCA
RERTWC
RECORD EVENT REPORT
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE TUCSON AZ
841 AM MST SUN JAN 13 2013 
...RECORD LOW TEMPERATURES SET FOR JAN 13...
LOCATION                  RECORD  OLD RECORD
BISBEE-DOUGLAS AIRPORT      07    15/1975 
FORT THOMAS                 11    12/1962 
SIERRA VISTA                16    18/1916
WILLCOX                     07    08/1913
$$

SXUS75 KTWC 131542
RERTWC
RECORD EVENT REPORT
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE TUCSON AZ
841 AM MST SUN JAN 13 2013 
...RECORD LOW TEMPERATURES SET FOR JAN 13...
LOCATION                  RECORD  OLD RECORD
BISBEE-DOUGLAS AIRPORT      07    15/1975 
...RECORD LOW TEMPERATURES SET FOR JAN 12...
LOCATION                  RECORD  OLD RECORD
FORT THOMAS                 11    11/1962 
KITT PEAK                   12    19/1989 
$$

SXUS75 KTWC 131458
RERTWC
RECORD EVENT REPORT 
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE TUCSON AZ
0746 AM MST SUN JAN 13 2013
...RECORD LOW TEMPERATURE SET AT DOUGLAS AZ...
 A RECORD LOW TEMPERATURE OF 7 DEGREES WAS SET AT DOUGLAS AZ TODAY. 
THIS BREAKS THE OLD RECORD OF 15 SET IN 1975.
$$

 

 

Well hung, that virga yesterday…

“Hanging virga” materialized yesterday, starting from a cluster of  late morning modest, but very cold, Cumulus clouds that transitioned to soft and small Cumulonimbus clouds as they approached the northern parts of Catalina, Charoleau Gap and Oracle yesterday.

How cold were those clouds?

Bases were at 10,000 feet, just above Mt. Sara Lemmon, at about -15 C (4 F), a real bottom temperature rarity for southern Arizona Cumulus clouds.  The highest tops, probably only reached 15,000-16,000 feet above sea level and would have been close to -30 C (-27 F), also exceptionally cold for such a low top height.  So, the clouds, for the most part, were less than 2 km (6,600 feet) thick.  At times, they appeared to be miniature summer clouds with all the glaciation and “shafting” going on.  Here are some shots:

10:25 AM.  Small Cumulus begin clustering NW of Catalina.
10:25 AM. Small Cumulus begin clustering NW of Catalina. No ice evident.
10:41 AM.  Same cluster, drifting east toward Charoleau Gap-Oracle.  Ice plume now seen streaming to the east from one of the taller clouds.
10:41 AM. Same cluster, but deeper, drifting east toward Charoleau Gap-Oracle. An ice plume can now be seen streaming to the east from one of the taller clouds.  When clouds are this cold, and small, only a few of the “lucky” largest ice crystals may fall directly out below the base, while most float off to the side as here.  If you were a skier up there, you’d call it “powder snow”;  lots of single crystals rather than flakes.

Remarkably as cold as the bases were (-15 C), nature abhors starting an ice crystal until a liquid cloud drop has formed.  So, the sequence goes like this; liquid droplet cloud forms (as in our smallest Cumulus yesterday, “humilis”), but then they must develop further to produce ice.  There is a temperature AND drop size threshold requirement for ice formation, even in clouds this cold.  As the clouds fatten upward, the  drops in them get a little larger, and at the same time the temperature drops, too, and, voila, the ice-forming criteria for that day are met, and out pop the ice crystals.  Those depth/cloud top temperature criteria change some from day to day.

And,  as you likely noticed and wrote in your weather diary, those cold, but shallowest clouds yesterday did not produce ice, while ones that got a bit colder and fatter did.  Most of the time, low-based clouds that reach just -10 C to -12 C  begin to produce ice, and even at higher cloud top temperatures in the summer on occasion,  the latter, a LOT of ice at cloud top temperatures warmer than -10 C.

There’s the enigma.  How’s come yesterday’s tiniest  clouds, with bases at -15 C, did not produce ice immediately?  What is it about those itty bitty first formed drops that makes them so resistant to freeze?  Surface tension?  This kind of result for small cold clouds was found repeatedly in our aircraft studies at the U of WA.

11:29 AM. I looked to the sky for answers about ice formation, but it didn’t seem to know either.

11:04 AM.  The same cluster continues to expand and deepen with lots of "hanging virga".
11:04 AM. The same cluster continues to expand and deepen with lots of “hanging virga” just beyond CG, and in the distance.

 

 

Before the vast mid-afternoon clearing (associated with that passing trough /wind shift line above us), there was another complex of glaciating modest Cumulus and Cumulonimbus clouds with significant virga that went over the same area as shown in these photos.  No doubt, someone got a flake or two, or more likely, a tiny ball of graupel (soft hail).

SONY DSC
1:56 PM. Tiny non-ice producing Cumulus looking toward the SW. Notice the lean of the tops of these little guys toward the left, or toward the SE. They show that the winds have veered from westerly to northwesterly since the morning hours, this veering associated with the passage of the trough over us. When you see that lean in that direction, its pretty much over (the chances of precip).

By mid-afternoon, it was “all over” as the Cumulus dwindled to tiny versions, with no ice, and ultimately disappeared within two hours.

And with the clearing skies late in the day, the plummeting temperature.  Was 31.x F by 7 PM, but just after that, the “sliders” started, as they usually do here on a little hillside, and the temperature pretty much leveled out and has briefly hit 28 F.  In the meantime, just down the road, its 21 F in the Black Horse subdivision!  The CDO wash would be even colder if we had a measurement there.

You can see our regional temperatures here from the U of AZ, and the more local ones here from Weather Underground, now owned by The Weather Channel and they better not screw it up any more than they already have re radar depictions (they don’t work as good.)

The weather just ahead?

More little troughs like yesterday, such as one passing over us today, and later tomorrow, likely to again to be ones, especially tomorrow,  bringing a few small Cumulus over us in the afternoon, some of them shedding ice. We already have some ice clouds, low Cirrus, today, and along with those, maybe a flake or two of Altocumulus.  It’ll be pretty scenic again.

Then The Warming, a vast and an amazingly quick change in the flow pattern that warms us up during the middle of the coming week.  And, no rain indicated in mods for next 15 days, though as always, there is hope in the final few days that it will be wrong.  More on that way down toward the bottom.

Some newsworthy weather is farther ahead…

There is something that will happen that you’ll read about, extreme cold in the East, 8-12 days out.  This happens as a gigantic storm-blocking ridge piles up along the West Coast, all the way into Alaska.  In these situations, Pacific storms are diverted to Alaska where the folks up there think its comfy with all that marine air blasting into them from the ocean, but then, that air turns cold over the continent and streams down into the US akin liquid nitrogen rolling down the side of Mt. Lemmon.

Why even talk about this when its so far out in the models, since they are often a joke that far out?

You do it, stick your neck out,  because of how POTENT the “signal” is in the NOAA “ensembles of spaghetti” for this to happen.  Besides, you might be getting a “scoop” as well, if the other forecasters aren’t on their toes.

A pattern of extreme temperatures over ALL of North America is just about certain.  Check this  out below.  I’ve added some text on to help you know what to think when you see it.  That’s what I try to do here; tell people what to think.  Its great!

Valid 216 h from last night, or the evening of January 21st, AST.
Valid 216 h from last night, or the evening of January 21st, AST.

The red arrow is up the shaft of a gigantic ridge, the one foreseen in the models lately.  Note how special we are along the West Coast in this plot; there are no other protrusions of ridges anywhere in the whole northern hemisphere like this ours!

What is a ridge composed of? Deep WARM, comfy air.  So a huge blob of warm air IS going to arise along the West Coast in 8 days. That translates to much warmer than normal temperatures practically from Alaska to here, probably a heat wave in southern Cal around this time.

At the same time, when the flow is disturbed like this, and has so much “amplitude” (goes north and south so much) like it shows here, that is, goes WAY to the north on one side of the ridge and then WAY to the south on the other, you get temperature extremes as you could EASILY guess.   Extra warm over “there” somewhere means extra cold over “yonder” (in this case, the eastern half of the US.

Why do these coming temperature extremes have so much credibility?

Its because of the remarkably (to me)  tight bunching of the lines (500 millibar contours), the way they are in the above graphic.  This  means the signal, the factors putting this pattern together are powerful, and have  not been disturbed by the “noise” of the many small errors DELIBERATELY put into the model at the beginning of the run to get these differing plots.  For 8-10 days out, these are about the “tightest bunching of lines” I have seen, meaning the forecast is robust; namely, is going to happen.

For us it means a further extension of droughty, but warm days that follow soon on the heels of our cold spell,  into the 20-25th of January.

Beyond that?

As robust as the forecast is for 8-10 days out shown above, the models are pretty much clueless about how this pattern falls apart (not too surprisingly).  To experience model cluelessness hereabouts, check this plot out below for 15 days away from the same computer run and notice the “out of phase” pattern being indicated.  The gray lines show a trough in our region (maybe storms and cool), and the yellow lines, from a model run just 12 h later, last evening, shows a ridge over the West (warm, sunny weather indicated here).  A forecaster, looking at this, and covering all the bases might say:

“Continued cool with variable clouds and showers today, otherwise mostly sunny and warm.”

That’s about what you get out of this last plot.  Not much confidence.

The End.

Valid for the evening of January 27th AST.
Valid for the evening of January 27th AST.

Hanging virga on tap (its not a beer)

Cloud patches and upper level trough approaching this morning.  They’ve got some precip in’em, but its a little dry underneath those cloud patches coming toward us so that only a few ice crystals/flakes will make it to the ground from the isolated, hanging virga we’ll see in the later morning hours.   Should be kind of pretty though, big, long trails of snow coming down from really cold Altocumulus, Stratocumulus, and small Cumulus (coldest tops likely to be below -25 C, -13 F).

Trough apex and wind shift aloft goes over us at mid-day (seen here from the U of WA), and you know what that means.  Those morning clouds will move off, leaving only small, COLD-like-us, Cumulus clouds since the atmosphere is mainly moving downhill behind the upper level trough wind shift line, and that means a clearing.

Here are the temperatures around this morning;  “milder” on hillsides, colder in low spots hereabouts, as you know from experience.  Cold air drains like water off hillsides, is replaced by warmer air just above that is not in contact with the cooling ground surface.  The air then cools at the surface,  slides down hill and fills up washes and lower elevations in general.  (Right now, 6:43 AM update, holding steady at 29 F, but down the road and down the hill, in Black Horse Ranch, its 23 F.  See map here.)

Happens over and over again, and so if you have a temperature trace to watch, and you live on a hillside, you will see blobs of warmer and colder air passing by soon after dark, usually just at one or two miles per hour.  Even the smallest little creek beds have little, slow downhill moving streams of cold air.  If you live in a bit of a low spot on the side of a hill, you’ll know this from, say, walking the dog along a road along the hillside.

Check this nice graphic below from the U of AZ of regional temperatures with the infrared satellite image overlain on them.  Tucson was 26 F at that time while here in the little hills above Catalina it was 29 F at 4 AM).  HUGE difference…  Well, its something.

Note -14 F at the Grand Canyon, -15 F at Bryce Canyon, UT.  Only 7 F at Big Bear Lake, CA (L35 on map), 33 F right on the coast of southern Cal at NFG1, by San Diego.  It’ll get colder yet at most of these stations in the hours before sunrise.

You can also see in this graphic the cloud patches that are heading our way in SE Cal and western AZ.

Map for 4 AM AST today.
Map for 4 AM AST today.

 

Other than today, precip chances have been diminishing after a model “feint” indicating some snow on the 14th.   Its gone now, like so many model-indicated precip days.  It now is looking more likely that January will end as another dry month, even if it rains some near the end of the month (beyond the current dry-for-15 days model predictions).

Some scenes and clouds from yesterday.

First this nice shot of the Catalina Mountains…  OK, I really didn’t get a picture of them yesterday, and so this will have to do.  Its what the Catalina Mountains WOULD look like if they were 11 inches high and it had snowed on them, and it was windy when it was snowing.  Here’s another one of the effect of wet snow on our dried out from summer grasses.  I thought it was kind of pretty how the snow stuck on stems.

SONY DSC

 

 

 

 

 

10:11 AM along Equestrian Trail Road.
10:11 AM along Equestrian Trail Road.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Now some scenes of those great, if chilly-looking blue skies dotted with small Cumulus clouds yesterday; no ice detected falling from them by these eyeballs.  Should see similar sights today, except ice/snow should be hanging down (he sez).

8:45 AM.  Pretty Stratocumulus hovers over Oro Valley.
8:45 AM. Pretty Stratocumulus hovers over Oro Valley.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1:28 PM  Cumulus humilis forms over Oro Vally.  No ice haze visible though cloud tops were, from the TUS afternoon sounding data, -11 to -13 C, below the usual ice-forming temperature here of about -10 C.
1:28 PM Cumulus humilis clouds form in a line over Oro Vally. No ice haze visible though cloud tops, from the TUS afternoon sounding data,  were -11 to -13 C, below the usual ice-forming temperature here of about -10 C.  A second factor in ice-formation is drop sizes in the clouds.  The smaller the drop size (as in small clouds like these, or in lenticular clouds) the lower the temperature required to initiate ice (from U of WA studies).

 

 

 

 

 

———

1Oceanside Camp Pendleton Marine Corps Air Station

 

 

FROPA! (plus some corrections in red….)

2:26 AM, Catalina:  S- (light snow), 33.9 F, 0.01 inches so far.  Precip not registering on Wunderground map site for some reason.

3:20 AM:  S– (very light snow), 34.8 F.  Temperature beginning to recover following precip, snow almost over, just a “skiff”, 0.3 inches.

6:20 AM:  Total now a measly 0.02 inches, less than expected, but in keeping with jet “rule of thumb”; nil precip until 500 mb core goes by1, and its just getting here now–120 mph wind now at just around 18,000 feet over TUS, an extremely exceptional event for winds that strong to be that low!

Correction on storm total:   Mr. Cloud Maven person forgot that when it snows, the small orifice into which the rain water usually flows without hesitation is clogged by that SNOW and the tipping bucket does NOT tip until the snow melts.  It began melting in mid-morning, and by the time it was done melting, there was a total of 0.10 inches, 0.14 inches at the Sutherland Heights gage.   This is a lot better than 0.02 inches.

County ALERT gage totals disappointing, too, just a few hundredths to a tenth of an inch; most with zeroes.  Mountains reports missing since it fell as snow.   (As with my own gage, the snow is melting into the buckets in the ALERT gages and they are now showing precip! )

(Here, the snow has melted and dribbled into the gage–NO it hadn’t!!!!) ((Shoulda looked inside the funnel before writing that!))

Only expecting small Cumulus today, but its cold enough that they could have some ice in them.  It would be something for you to watch for.

Here’s the temperature and pressure traces for this dramatic cold front passage (FROPA) here in Catalina last night around midnight with the chart below beginning around 7 PM, this from a pitiful jpeg of computer monitor since the software I use will not print two parameters on the same graph (please fix this, Lightsoft Weather Centre, UK!):SONY DSC

You can’t read it, but the temperature dropped from 50.x F to 33.x F in about an hour, with period of very light snow, no accumulation at the end of that hour.  And you can see what we meteorologists call a “pressure check” when a cold front goes by; starts rising immediately.

Yesterday’s clouds

Lots of lenticular formations around, beginning with this rosy specimen just downstream of the Catalinas at dawn:

7:17 AM.  Altocumulus lenticularis downstream of the Catalinas.
7:17 AM. Altocumulus lenticularis downstream of the Catalinas.

Lenticular clouds downwind of the Catalinas persisted for hours yesterday.  Its sometimes hard to tell that they are not over the mountains, but you can see that in the U of AZ time lapse for yesterday.

BTW, if you want to know how the UFO thing got started, legend has it that it was due to a hovering Altocumulus lenticularis cloud downstream of Mt. Rainier in the 1940s.

Viewing this U of AZ time lapse movie will tell you why lenticulars have sometimes been reported as UFOs.   It really does look like a hovering “vehicle” in the morning hours in the movie, and a “hovering”, which is what we know alien spacecraft do; hover.  In the face of the strong winds up there yesterday, hovering is, for most folks, unexpected, suspicious behavior.  Check it out.

SONY DSC
8:38 AM, below: CIrrus castellanus and floccus, i. e., “cumulocirrus”, Cirrus showing a lot of instability up there, steeper than usual decrease in temperature with increasing height. Makes things bubbly.

Finally, after the heavy mid-level overcast in the mid-late afternoon, a brief sunset bloom due to a distant clear slot beyond the horizon (way down at the bottom).

 

12:28 PM.  Here's comin' at you; Cirrostratus way up top, below, Altocumulus lenticulars, and Cirrus spissatus (thick ice clouds)
12:28 PM. Here’s comin’ at you, looking to the west; Cirrostratus way up top, below,  Altocumulus lenticulars, and Cirrus spissatus (thick ice clouds possibly evolved from glaciating lenticular patches.  Very complex scene. Thought about omitting it because what I couldn’t name and explain things?)
1:02 PM.  Altocumulus opacus invaded sky rapidly from the west.  Bottom looks pretty much like a lenticular, but it was scooting along, something true lenticular clouds don't do.  Hmmmm.  Maybe I should omit this one, too.
1:02 PM. Altocumulus opacus invaded sky rapidly from the west. Bottom part looks pretty much like a lenticular, but it was scooting along, something true lenticular clouds don’t do. Hmmmm. Maybe I should omit this one, too.
1:27 PM.  ACSL is back again downwind of the Catalinas! (Altocumulus Standing Lenticular)
1:27 PM. ACSL is back again downwind of the Catalinas! (Altocumulus Standing Lenticular)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5:46 PM.  A heavy layering of Altocumulus (opacus) is under lit by the sun for just a few moments.  Like me, you may have initially given up on a "bloom", by, by golly, it happened!  BTW, as often happens, these heavy looking clouds were a lot higher than you might think, about 17,000 feet above Catalina (from the TUS sounding.)
5:46 PM. A heavy layering of Altocumulus (opacus) is under lit by the sun for just a few moments. Like me, you may have initially given up on a “bloom”, but, by golly, it happened! BTW, as often happens, these heavy looking clouds were a lot higher than you might think, about 17,000 feet above Catalina (from the TUS sounding.)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What’s out there beyond the present cold spell and the warming after that?

This is kind of intriguing to me even though its kind of a waste of time, too. We’ll be reel cold for awhile, then it will suddenly warm up to seasonal temperatures for a few days.  We know that.   But then what?

Our models have been churning out wildly different forecasts toward the end of the month, and with those, wildly differing weather occurs here, naturally. These model forecasts are like a 5-foot wide puddle of water on a pot-holed street like the ones we have here in Catalina that they only repair in the most rudimentary way, throw some asphalt crumble in the hole, that its pretty much what they call a “repair.”  Maybe its because we’re considered “po’ folk.”  Let’s see, where was I?  Oh, yeah, that puddle could be an inch deep or three feet deep. You just don’t know for sure.

One way to “dip stick” that “puddle” is in our NOAA spaghetti plots. At the end of this is the latest one from last night’s global data. You can see how wild (humorous) the forecasts are in the yellow and gray lines, indicating exactly opposite conditions in the West at the end of the month for those model runs at 00 Z (5 PM AST) and 12 Z (5 AM AST yesterday). Pretty bad.

The spag plot below from last night’s data suggest the warm ridge has the edge at this point (note clustering of blues lines to the northern US; red lines still confused).  With a ridge holding forth, it would be a comfy time in AZ late in the month, not cold and blustery.

Valid for 5 PM AST January 25th.
Valid for 5 PM AST January 25th.

Still, its not the final word, remembering that the atmosphere remembers. It will be interesting if it remembers enough to bust our venerable spag plots.  That’s what makes it so darn interesting!

The End.

——————

1Its interesting that such an old style methodology, of the type used by forecasters  before the rise of weather computing models, would seem to have equaled our best models in 2012.

Into the cold

Today, as everyone knows, will be the last pleasant day for quite awhile, so we’d better get out and enjoy it if you can, maybe call in sick.  Likely to be a couple of AZ low temperature records set over the next week.

The skies will be great today, as they always are with some clouds present, and for a few days afterwards in the cold air with those deep blue skies along with passing Cumulus clouds, that at times and even though they are shallow, will send some virga down as the colder parts of the troughs go by.   Should provide for some nice late afternoon and evening photo ops in the days ahead.

Today the satelllite imagery plus looking out the window, shows lots of Cirrus clouds today, probably devolving into dense, shady Altostratus at times.  And a scenic,  Altocumulus lenticularis cloud1 downstream from the Cat Mountains is pretty much a lock.

Also, in the progression of clouds today, we will probably see that clear slot that so often separates the middle and high clouds from the low, frontal clouds go by.  If the timing of that clear slot is right, could be an extra special sunset.

Some Cirrus from yesterday, another one of those rarer days with virtually no contrails in the Cirrus, followed by a nice Catalina sunset:

2:36 PM.  Cirrus fibratus (pretty straight fibers) looking NW.  Note lack of contrails.
2:36 PM. Cirrus fibratus (pretty straight fibers) looking NW. Note lack of contrails.
5:45 PM.  Cirrostratus with embedded Cirrus of some kind (upper right).
5:45 PM. Cirrostratus fibratus (has streaks) with what looks to be  a lower Cirrus uncinus (upper right and in the distance).

Rain, from the U of AZ mod run at 11 PM AST,  has the rain beginning tonight after 10 PM AST and lasting but a couple of hours.   Amounts here in Catalina, between 0.10 and about 0.40 inches, average of 0.25 inches, virtually no change from what was predicted 24 h ago.

Just about everything mentioned yesterday is the same today in the model, marginal cloud top temperatures for precip at the TUS site for most of the time the front goes by (in the model), but  cloud tops will be colder over us and more likely to precip.

Seems temperatures will  be marginal for ice-in-rain drops at the ground here since the much colder air will not arrive with the front’s very narrow rain band but encroach as it departs.

Also of some interest, the jet core at 500 mb is shown to become bifurcated with one branch overhead S as the rain moves in (another branch over NW AZ).  This would be compatible with a rule of thumb about the rain and the jet at 500 mb.  Rain, with extremely rare exceptions (<5% of the time), does not fall here on the southeast side of a jet stream racing to towards the NE, as we will have over us today.  Will be curious to see if this “rule” holds up this time.

Tomorrow will be one of those cold days with spectacular small Cumulus clouds contrasted against the deep, dark blue of the winter sky.  Should be some great scenes of light and shadows on the Catalina Mountains.

Snow ahead?

Snow falls here later in this cold, almost week-long episode, as a series of troughs plunge southward along the West Coast to AZ.  Most likely day for some snowfall in Catalina, is now on the 14th2.  Here’s the map for that, valid for 11 AM AST, Monday, from IPS MeteoStar:

Monday the 14th 2013011000_CON_GFS_SFC_SLP_THK_PRECIP_WINDS_114
Green areas denote those regions where the model has foreseen precip in the previous 6 h.

 

The weather way ahead–Dr. Jeckyl or Mr. Hyde?

Check out these bowl of rubber bands from “flapping butterfly wings” (slight perturbations put into the initial data ingested into  the WRF-GFS model after which its re-run a number of times to see what slight differences do). The first one below is for the evening of January 20th, a real laugher considering its only 10-11 days away now and the mods are still clueless.

Note the yellow lines, a “control” run from last night’s 5 PM global data, and see how they BULGE toward the north over the western half of the US.  Then look at the hard-to-see gray lines representing a “control” run from just 12 h earlier, that from yesterday’s 5 AM AST global data.  They BULGE southward, the opposite way the yellow lines do.

The yellow lines indicate a huge ridge over the West, with little precip and seasonal temperatures in the SW US.  On the other hand, the 5 AM control run shows a continuation of our present storm pattern and continued injections of cold air down the West Coast.  Check out that gray line over northern Cal, for example.

So, from one model run to the next lately, our weather toward the end of the month in Catalina has gone from “yawn” to “yikes” (the latter  blurted out yesterday when I saw that 5 AM output and all the storms it had).  But blurted out a “yawn” when viewing the output from last evening.  No precip after the cold week.

However, in deciding which of those two outcomes is most likely you have to dwell on the predominance of those blue lines that also bulge northward and are mainly located in southern Canada.  Those strongly indicate that the “highs” , the  bulges to the north over the western US, will prevail on the 20th, not the storms and cold weather with them.

annotated Evening of Jan 20th spag_f264_nhbg
Arrow points in the general direction of Arizona.

But how about after the 20th, at the very end of last night’s model run 15 days out?  Now you see BOTH the yellow and the gray lines are bulging to the south (creating a trough bowl), AND, more importantly, those blue lines are not constrained to southern Canada, but are all over the West as well.  Remembering that the atmosphere remembers suggests that the models are remembering, too, trying to regenerate the kind of flow pattern we’ve already been experiencing after a significant, quite pleasant, really, break from the cold week.

tated_spag_f360_nhbg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

While this last panel  is also a real laugher in many ways, due to all that uncertainty that’s indicated, the wildness in all those lines, you might want to hop off the fence in a longer term forecast toward the end of the month by thinking that what we’ve been having will return, a sort of “Back to the Future.”

Re-inforcing this view is how the red lines (570 dm height contours), usually on the periphery of the jet stream, become more compacted in the LATER, second plot compared with the first!  This is a little remarkable since that would suggest the models have a better handle on the circulation pattern at 15 days over 11 days.  Odd.  Note, too, that those lines at 15 days are FAR to the south of AZ, supporting the idea of a cold trough in the SW.

———————————

1These are the almond shaped clouds composed of droplets with smooth, sharp edges that hover over the same spot, expanding and shrinking, sometimes for hours at a time, as the grade of moisture changes in the air being lifted behind the mountains.

2Personal aside:  Have friend, former WA State Climatologist who also worked at the U of WA as I did, arriving here with his wife on the 12th for a vacation from the dark days of wintertime Seattle.  They will be here for the whole cold week and possible snow as it turns out, and then go back.  Having looked at the progs,  he now wants to take a “vacation from his vacation”, maybe head off to Costa Rica after arriving in AZ!

FROPA, cold just ahead

Summary:  Wildcat mod has the front with a rain-turning-to-maybe a bit of snow-in-rain (its NOT SLEET!) between 10 PM AST on the 10th and 2 AM on the 11th.

Duration of precip?

Just three hours or so, quite awful;  too short for any significant accumulation of snow in the cold air behind the front.  This forecast cribbed from the U of AZ Weather Dept model outputs found here from the 11 PM AST data of last night1.  Here is a map of the predicted amounts just after the precip ends here at 2 AM:annotated 0001Ep

Its interesting that on this website we have been talking about not chances of rain, but rather amounts of 0.10 inches as the least amount likely and 0.50 inches at the top amount, and then yesterday, due to fast movement, lowering the top amount possible to 0.40 inches, with a median amounts of 0.30 inches or so and this is what the Beowulf Cluster has come up with last night, the first of these runs I have looked at for this storm!  It seems like if I guess something, then it just seems to come true, except on all those other days…

Now for a discussion of some vexatious, tedious details about our rain prospects in the coming FROPA:

Here is the jet configuration as the rain is about to begin on the evening of the 10th, from IPS:annotated 2013010900_CON_GFS_500_HGT_WINDS_060
As you can see, this model run (from IPS), from the global data taken at 5 PM AST, has the jet core at this level (500 mb) close to right over us, but a bit to the north if you look closely.  Precip is almost always partitioned in a black and white manner by where the core is at 500 mb in the SW US in the cooler half of the year (Nov-Apr).

So, its of some concern that the jet has not gone past us here at 5 AM AST the morning of the 11th after precip has been predicted by the models! That jet core is nowhere near us when the Wildcat Beowulf Cluster has rain here at 11 PM AST on the 10th; its still upwind over western AZ.

So, of some interest to see whether the rule of thumb about the jet core and precip holds up in this situation.  If it does, we could have a real disappointing FROPA, just sprinkles maybe.   Because the deeper colder, moist air is on the left hand side looking downwind, it implies shallower moist air arrives here,  shallower clouds, or separated layering during the FROPA band.  On the right hand side looking downwind, is usually far drier air with clouds limited to shallow Cu-Sc, mid-level clouds, often Altocumulus lenticularis, and Cirrus.   I just now checked with Beowulf predicted soundings, sometimes forgetting that there are model predictions of moisture layers above us, and they check out with the above assessment during the day tomorrow when the jet is far away from us.

Now looking at the Tucson soundings from our Beowulf model during the time of the precip, 10 PM to 2 AM on the 10th to 11th, it IS true that the clouds WILL be pretty shallow!  In fact, the projected temperatures in the moist surge accompanying the rain band in that model run are only a little below our ice-forming temperature of -10 C (14 F).  If the model is off by a couple of degrees (too cold) we could get nothing, or traces, just harmless Stratocu.

Gee, this is so interesting for a Cloud Maven person now!  You, too, I am sure!

Here’s an additional thought.  Those Beowulf soundings are literally for over the mountain in Tucson.  Every mile to the north, because we are near the jet core, means everything will be that bit colder, cloud tops that bit higher.  Furthermore, with the southwest to west flow, they’ll bank up the best they can against our side of the Catalinas.If Beowulf looked that the vertical layering of air right over Catalina tomorrow night, it likely would see lower cloud top temperatures than those shown for Tucson, and greater chances for rain here compared with there.  Get it?

So, we’re really left with a more marginal rain situation than would appear to be the case looking at the Beowulf rain amounts in the first panel above.   Dang.   Seeing what really happens will be a joy in a sense because of all these factors.

After the front….

Waves of cold air, one after another.  Beginning on the 11th, it will be one of the coldest 7 or so days in years here. Hope you don’t live in wash, where temps in the teens are likely at some point.  The NWS of course, is all over this.  Its been well predicted for more than a week in advance.

After the cold

One of the more astonishing forecast series has come out concerning the flow patterns after our week-long spell of severe cold with a powerful jet stream shooting down at us from Canada.  All of the jet stream activity in the ENTIRE US is forecast to recede north into Canada!  That kind of pattern means the whole US has been “milded”, as that happens, to continue a language innovation theme here.  Take a look at this flow pattern over the US and compare it to the one in the second panel.  Its an amazing change, almost a summer-looking pattern when the jet stream recedes to Canada.

2013010900_CON_GFS_500_HGT_WINDS_336

Not much going on here.  January thaw over the whole US?  Looks like it except for the extreme NE.

But this is NOT quite at the end of the model run.  What’s to happen next?  What would you guess?  No hints here on this map, that’s for sure.  Remember what to fall back on, the past.  Predict the future from the past as a first guess.  If you did, not seeing anything going on here, you would see in the last few panels, another powerful, cold trough beginning to head in our direction.   Of course, it may go away, but you have the past on your side; the atmosphere remembers what its been doing, and maybe it has not yet forgotten our cold spells after the mild one ahead that finishes out the month.

Brain, such as it is, exhausted, quitting here.

The End

Not quite:  Just peaked at the 11 PM AST US model run now at 7:50 AM, and the “past” comes back in a hurry in this latest run.  There is no substantial mild period to the end of the month.  Its MUCH shorter, maybe a week before things cave in again in the last week of Jan.  Hang on.

———————————

1If you do peak, you might also send some $$$ their way.  They are in dire straights these days.   Mr. Cloud-maven person has.

 

 

 

Clouds go round and round with a sprinkle-rain landing close by last night

One of the things I like to do when I am wrong, yesterday having predicted a trace to a few hundredths of rain last night from that disturbance going by to the south, is to spend a LOT of time talking about how close I was.

Its true the zuperkomputer, the Beowulf Cluster, at our U of AZ Weather Department, did NOT predict rain here at all, but it did not have the sprinkles as close as they came to us, either!  Exulting here that bit.  Going to look on “trace detector” (car parked in dust and sun outside) now, just in case there is a drop image somewhere.  Will report back on that later.  Stand by.

Also, you should be looking around for drop images in the dust on stuff, too.  If you’re going to be a “trace king”, you have to look hard in AZ so you don’t miss anything.  A lot of reported traces shows that you are indeed a true CMJ!  A trace of rain is incredibly important to microbes; a drop is like the ocean to them.  Think about it the next time it sprinkles on you.

Below, the evidence of how close we came to one drop of sprinkle-rain last night (remember, it would NOT have been “drizzle” had it occurred; drizzle falls from LOW-based clouds that hug mountains, not from Altostratus clouds such as we had):

Sprinkle from Altostratus deck just to SE of Catalina at 2: 40 AM AST today.  Will be looking on car parked outside (trace detector) just in case a drop fell here.
Sprinkle from Altostratus deck just to SE of Catalina at 1: 40 AM AST last night.

 

Arrow added into the same image above in case you did not see how close that sprinkle came to us the first time.
Arrow added into the SAME image as the first one in case you did not see how close that sprinkle came to us when you first looked at it.  I really want you to know. I feel its quite important.

Loop of clouds and sprinkle rain going round and round here.

As a CMJ (Cloud Maven Junior), you would have seen and logged the low hanging virga extruding downward in one spot from that thick layer of Altostratus at sunset, that As band that also had something that looked a bit like an anvil extruding from it.  Here is the “documentation” for these claims:

5:16 PM.  Heavy Altostratus with scary anvil-like feature and VIRGA just to SW of Catalina about 50 miles.
5:16 PM. Heavy Altostratus with scary anvil-like feature and VIRGA just to SW of Catalina about 50 miles.

Finally, this sunset shot of the same band 30 minutes later, making the same points as above again to better imprint them on you:

5:36 PM.  Same band of Altostratus with anvil-like feature and virga (to right) at sunset.
5:36 PM. Same band of Altostratus with anvil-like feature and virga (to right) at sunset.

The above has been, in effect, a burst of altruism.  Let’s say I am hiking on the trails, I’ve missed a forecast, and you’re heading in my direction.  At about 100 yards you will want to exit right or left and bushwhack it for awhile until I have passed to avoid an extended “in hindsight…”, hike-delaying conversation in which you have no real interest. Its gonna happen.  It would be kinda like this blog-blab right now….

Now, feeling better, some REALLY pretty Cirrus uncinus from last evening:

5:17 PM.  Pretty Cirrus uncinus along with some other varieties/species.
5:17 PM. Pretty Cirrus uncinus along with some other varieties/species.

 

Now that I have gotten yesterday’s burr-under-my-saddle dispensed with, can ahead now, not stuck anymore, clouds moving away, can have new thoughts…

Will look at model outputs and see which one has the most rain/snow in it for us on the 11th-12-13th, with that Arctic blast, and think about the onset of that new “zonal” pattern after that, that pattern that will mild us1 quite a bit after the Arctic blast.  Beginning look at mods now….

WHAT?!!!  Its back!   That “trough bowl” collecting area for storms in AZ and the Southwest, after only short respite from cold storms.  What happened to theThis is remarkable, check this prog for January 22nd at 5 PM AST.  If it looks familiar, its almost the same as the map for yesterday afternoon, the 7th, but 15 days later!  I repeat myself in the gif for emphasis now that I see I have repeated myself.

Valid for 5 PM AST, January 22nd.
Valid for 5 PM AST, January 22nd.

What’s the gut check here?  “Spaghetti”, which seems appropriate for a “gut check.”  Yesterday we saw that the NOAA spaghetti plots varied wildly 15 days out, making ANY model forecast that popped beyond about a week out pretty unreliable.

But what aspect of the atmosphere do we know about that makes a prog 14 days out that looks like weather we had yesterday look that bit more credible:  the mantra, “the atmosphere remembers.”

Persistence, a forecast based on weather you’ve already had for the past week or three, and projecting it into the future is one of our more reliable forecasting techniques.  Sounds silly, but its true.  The pattern eventually changes, but its hard to catch that tipping point when it does.  Yesterday, the mods had that pattern change and it was some support for that in the NOAA spaghetti plots.  That support has weakened, though not gone, seen here if you dare.

——————Module on conversational meteorology——–making the past the future

Imagine, that on January 1st last, a neighbor asked you, knowing that you were a cloud maven junior, maybe have Asberger’s Syndrome, and in your case, focus on itty-bitty weather details and data:

“What kind of weather do you think we’ll have in January?”  Without divulging details of your forecasting methodology, hindsight, and then trying to remember, if you could, what the weather had been like in the two weeks leading your neighbor’s question, i.e., the time when the new flow pattern began here, you could have furrowed your brow and said, with at least feigned authority:

“I see below normal temperatures, perhaps much below, with a good chance of above normal precip. “‘Hey'”, and then going a bit too far, you might have ventured into, “…and I think there’s a good chance of a real snow here in Catalina this month with all that cold air we’ll have.”

Today, with a severe cold spell ahead, you would be the forecasting guru of the block, icon of the next block party,  and all you had to do was remember, which can be hard sometimes.

In weather, it really is true:  the past is often the future.

—————-End of conversational meteorology module———————————————————–

So what to think?

Its not a bad idea to hedge your forecast longer term forecast with “persistence”; continuing below normal temperatures, maybe not as severely cold as what’s immediately ahead on the 12-14th, precip on the 11th.  Amounts, due to the speed of this thing, still 0.10 inches at the bottom, but I’d reduce the max potential to 0.40 from 0.50 inches, median then 0.30, about the same as the last prediction.   The flow pattern with this will be like the last front on the 31st, and so we’ll do better than most of areas around us in amount because the clouds will bank up against our side of the Catalinas more than elsewhere.  Still expecting rain to change to snow at the end of the FROPA on Friday morning, the 11th, but amounts likely to be an inch or less now.  Dang, again.

Because it will be so cold aloft, and here, and there are minor disturbances that blow on through for the two days after the 11th, a passing flurry is likely (that from, as you KNOW, from “heavily glaciated clouds”, at least at times.

A bit much  today, so will gift you by quitting here.

The end.

———————–

1Using “mild” as a verb here; might be first time ever such use–William Safire, language-maven, where are you now that we need you?  Remember when we made fun of Alexander Haig, the Nixon admin Chief of Staff, about the way he used nouns as verbs, i.e.,  “gifted him.”  Now he can be considered a language pioneer since we hear that usage all the time.  Don’t forget to use “mild” as a verb today at least once:  “the weather pattern is going to mild us for awhile before the big freeze hits.”  That would be great!  Thanks.

Upper low passing to south; clouds to wrap around overhead from the southeast and east this evening

Backdoor rain?   Looks like any chance of rain will happen later this afternoon through overnight as mainly mid-level clouds twist around our low from the east.  That low is now over Yuma, AZ, and the center will pass to the south of us tonight.  We don’t see that happen too often.  Here’s a nice loop of the circulation around it, also showing the radar echoes–very handy.  (Some cloud shots at the bottom, way down there.)

Right now, our low is looking pretty dry, not much going on in it, or around it right now, and so any rain falling from mid-level cloud bands, like Altocumulus (with virga) and a likely deep band of Altostratus (also with virga),  will be pretty light; sprinkles to maybe a hundredth or two.  The better part of this is that with mid-level clouds coming from the east, they won’t be much dissipated by the air going downhill from the Catalina Mountains as you would expect with low clouds.  However, in Mexico, since it is so cold in the center of this low, there will likely be reports of snow in unusual places, as in the last storm.  The U of AZ Beowulf Cluster model, the best around for us, sees only a brief, fairly close call for rain tonight.

Still, while this low passage will be a little disappointing as far as rain goes, the skies will be great today with scattered Altocumulus, likely with a little virga, and scattered Cirrus, with a great sunset.  Both of these cloud types can be very “photogenic” on days like this.  Likely those mid-level clouds will clear out tomorrow morning, so get’em while you can.  If you don’t, of course,  this compulsive cloud photographer will.

Full cold ahead

Get ready for some terribly cold days just ahead, likely some snow in Catalina still, though the more moist Canadian model prediction for this storm has dried out overnight–tending to be more in line the with US models which have always had this cold wave as a light precip event.  Precip is pretty much guaranteed here, and some snow probable in Catalina, but max and least precip totals from this storm have to be revised downward in view of the latest Canadian results.    Minimum  amount, 0.10 inches, max, 0.50 inches (was an inch due to how much offshore flow the prior Canadian models had the night before last).  So, most likely amount is between those two extremes, or about 0.30 inches with precip beginning during the day on the 11th.

A further disappointment is that the mods now see this storm as a quickly moving event, and the precip is over by evening on the 12th, so it ends up as just a 24 h period of rain and snow chances, most coming, of course, in the first segment, a line of rain changing to snow with the frontal cloud band and wind shift line on Friday, the 11th.  Dang.

What about the second cold blast on the 15th-16th?

Still coming, but this wiggle in the jet stream shooting down at us from the northwest, has a trajectory toward us that is farther east than it was shown in the models earlier, and the farther east and the further away the trajectory is from the coast,  the drier these cold pushes will be.  So, that second blast of cold air, while still looking very cold, is also looking pretty dry right now; may only get a passing snow flurry, or we’ll just see scattered small Cumulus with some virga.

In these latest model runs the jet stream pattern that has led to our “trough bowl”, the favored location where storms have been collecting in our region for the past month, begins shifting to the east at mid-month, and what’s more, the amplitude of the north-south oscillations in the jet stream fade to a more west to east flow.

This very different than what was depicted just the night before last.  Here’s what I mean.  Shown below is the first forecast panel, high “amplitude” pattern in the jet stream–always associated with temperature extremes, cold where the jet dips down, like HERE, and warmer than usual where it shoots up from the southwest,for example,  there in Alaska.

Valid for the evening of January 15th.  An example of "high amplitude jet stream configuration associated with temperature extremes.
Valid for the evening of January 15th. An example of “high amplitude jet stream configuration associated with temperature extremes.

This is a very common pattern.  You probably remember how warm it was in Alaska during the 1962-63, and the 1976-1977 winters, but how friggin’ cold it was back East when this kind of high amplitude pattern was pretty extreme and persisted for weeks: the jet racing into Alaska from the mid-Pacific, and then shooting south into the US.   Really horrible times for the East in those winters.

But look at what the model sees for the end of the 15-day forecast period, shown below!  The jet hardly has any amplitude, just shoots in from the Pacific in a west to east flow.  That means no temperature anomalies to speak of, and a moist West Coast regime, sometimes with precip getting this far south, too.

Valid the evening of January 22nd, a Tuesday.
Valid the evening of January 22nd, a Tuesday.

What does spaghetti say about all of these changes?

Its pretty clueless, that is, slight changes in the observations make a big difference in what happens, and that’s why its so wild looking in the Pacific and the US (shown below).  This means you probably can’t count on the above pattern a lot, except that the amplitudes have gone down, that seems to be a pretty solid expectation.   That jet surging into AZ could just as well be intruding into Washington State in a west to east pattern.  That would mean that our 30-days of below normal temperatures here in AZ, beginning in mid-December (shown here by the NWS, lower right panel),  are about to end after about a week to ten days, and with that, a long dry spell likely to set in.

valid 21 January 2013 spag_f360_nhbg-1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yesterday’s clouds

Mostly Altostratus, thinning at times to Cirrus, and late, a few Altocumulus/Cirrocumulus patches.  Here are a couple of shots.

7:22 AM.  Under lit Altostratus at sunrise.  Those little pouches are regions of light snowfall (virga).
7:22 AM. Under lit Altostratus at sunrise. Those little pouches are regions of light snowfall (virga).
SONY DSC
1:49 PM. Boring, generic Altostratus translucidus, an ice cloud. Sometimes droplet clouds like Altocumulus are embedded in them, but none can be seen here (they would be dark, sharp-edged flecks). The massive clearing that occurred in the late afternoon is visible on the horizon.  If you saw that clearing, it would have been a great time to tell your friends that, “Oh, I think it will be sunny in 3 hours.”  It would have been quite a magical moment for you.
5:36 PM.  This beauty of a patch of Cirrocumulus (tiny granulation) and a lump of Altocumulus.
5:36 PM. This beauty of a patch of Cirrocumulus undulatus (tiny granulations in waves) and a lump of Altocumulus (lower left). TUcson sounding indicates they were about 15,000 feet above the ground at -20 C (-4 F).  No ice apparent.  It happens.

 

 

“You’re really not going to like it”

The above, a quote from Douglas Adam’s hypersupercomputer, “Deep Thought”, from the 1980s classic sci-fi radio series, “Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy”, spoken by DT as he prepares to give the answer to “life and everything.”  In the context of the computing grandeur of DT, as one website quotes, “Don’t even mention these”:

  • The Milliard Gargantubrain
  • The Googleplex Star Thinker
  • The Great Hyperlobic Omni-Cognate Neutron Wrangler
  • The Multicorticoid Perspecutron Titan Muller
  • The Pondermatic

These still make you laugh from that classic NPR radio series-Eagles theme here).

I wanted to distract you with laughter if you are one of those persons who love Arizona or are a snow birdy solely because of its warm, sunny weather in winter.  Not gonna happen this month1.

The answers to “weather and everything” below, and you’re not going to like them, unless you’re a skier, and you come to Arizona for great powder skiing!

By the numbers, what’s ahead:

Weather event 1.  a little cut off low travels across northern Mexico from southern California bringing some fabulous-looking clouds today (high ones like Cirrus),  and a brief shower at anytime tomorrow through Tuesday morning when its closest to us.  Nice.   But its not too cold yet.  That comes later.

Rain in #1?  Top pot (-ential): 0.25 inches; bot pot, just a trace.  Most likely amounts hereabouts? A few hundredths to a tenth.  Hoping for the development of a narrow, odd line of high-based (Altocumulus level) Cumulonimbus clouds that wrap around the upper low center as it goes by to south tomorrow.  Wispy storms like this could produce little shower areas not conducive to model resolution at any time since the moisture threads running around it will be very narrow.  You’ll have to be watching.  Have camera ready for spectacular Ac castellanus (he sez) today and/or tomorrow.

In summary, today you will begin to be clouded over.  On to event 2

Event 2, begins January 11th.

Summary: Yikes!  Takes a few days to get through this.  Check this prog out from Canada from last evening’s global data crunch (especially, the upper left and lower right panels):

Valid for 5 PM AST, Friday January 11th. “Totally awesome!” This new depiction moves this giant trough to offshore of southern Cal-Baja. You know that means. More water streaming north into AZ before the Big Cold hits, molecules of water vapor being sucked out of Pacific. That would be fantastic.  One of the best model forecasts I have seen in a LONG time.  Congratulations to Enviro Can for coming out with this last night.  A real winner.

OK, quite exuberated over this Canadian forecast.  For one thing, the dreaded super cold air is delayed, though it  still happens after this big trough goes by.  But mainly from this prog above, our precip potential is jacked up by twice with an upper level configuration like this, so much of it offshore now.

In the preceding days after Event 1 ends Tuesday morning on the 8th, the temperatures will rebound nicely, too, before the Big Whammy on the 11th-12th.

Rain in Event#2, January 11th (begins later in day)-13th?  I think now you have to be thinking the “top pot” here in Catalina is 1.00 inches over a 48-72 h period, bottom pot, 0.30 inches (i.e., less than 10% chance of more; 10% chance of less).  Median of these “best extreme guesses”, 0.65 inches. So, we got us another sure-fire substantial rain, even if the minimum is all we get.  Go desert wildflowers!

Now, a caveat…  US mods don’t have the flow as far offshore in event #2 as the Canadians do, thus, our mods have a much drier depiction for this storm.  In these kinds of situations, no model has the complete truth, and so mentally you try to integrate the two.   The lower precip bound of just 0.30 inches here is due to a compromise in actual flow patterns that might eventuate.

Quitting for a second to dream about pounding rain on the flimsy Arizona roof we got…the only kind to have if you’re a real CMJ (cloud maven junior); are a precipophiliac, as I am, or just like the sound of what the wildflowers are getting out there in the desert.)

Snow in Catalina in #2?  Sure looks like it, toward the end of the precip, overnight 12th-13th.  Will expeculate that 1-4 inches will fall between Saturday night into Sunday morning.

Event #3.  The storms, though not nearly as moist as #2, troughs just keep “falling down the shoot” as the jet stream zips southward along the West Coast carrying storms to us for the foreseeable future with the timing of #3 on the evening of the 15th-16th (US WRF-GFS mod run from last evening’s data).  Here’s what that cold trough and following blast of cold air look like on the evening of the 15th.  A little snow is possible toward end of this event in Catalina, too.  This goes by really fast, which is bad for precip totals, and “good” for extra cold air arriving here, since its shooting down at us so fast, that cold air can’t be modified much into warmer air as it goes southward.

Vallid for 5 PM AST, Tuesday, January 15th.

Only in the “dying embers” of last night’s model run, one that ends after 15 days, on the 21st, does it appear that there is a break in the pattern of below normal temperatures here.  But, as we know, the atmosphere “remembers” for weeks at a time, so it may not be last long.

BTW, we are joined in cold air by our planetary neighbors in China, who are experiencing one of the coldest winters in 20-40 years.  In a preliminary newsy item from China, they have attributed the cold winter to warming….and melting ice caps.   Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.

In an aside, should we see some really cold air, as is likely, the argument that “its colder because its warmer” may show up here.  Its out there and I think it showed up after our February 2011 record freeze.  Remember, I am a cloud-maven, not a climate-maven, but some statements do seem silly.  Severe weather happens; always has, always will.

——————————–

1Its great, though, to see all those out-of-state license plates these days (Ohio, Ilinois, MN, PA, Iowa, ID, AK, Ontario, Can, seen just yesterday), knowing there are so many people who want to be where I am all the time, a permanent resident.  I am sure all of us Arizona “barnacles” feel the same way!