6:55 AM. A surnrise glow from receding CIrrus spissatus highlights Samaniego Ridge. Very pretty and dramatic.
8:19 AM. Forming uncinus, CIrrus that is. Note trails of precip beginnng to form under these tufts of Cirrus castellanus clouds.9:06 AM. Jet contrails begin to show up in a Cirrocumulus cloud composed of supercooled cloud droplets. You know what going to happen….something special for you to log in your cloud diary.
9:20 AM. Another patch of supercooled, very supercooled for that matter, Cirrocumulus with evidence of a jet contrail. But, is the jet above or IN the Cirrocu? TIme will tell.
How cold were those Cc clouds? See below.
(Begin technical module)
The Tucson balloon sounding1 for 5 AM AST, November 19th with writing on it. The height of these clouds was slightly lower in the mid-afternoon, but (as Altomumulus then) were still about -23 C. As we know, cloud bottoms almost always get lower with passing time because the higher parts of cloud shields are moving faster.
In the mid- -20s C, around -15 F. Height, about 21,000 feet above the ground here in Catalina. Hope you got that estimate of cloud height right.
————————————-
Continuing…
9:21 AM. ANOTHER jet streaks by! This is going to be darn interesting, a rarity, like seeing a grey parrot in Catalina! The secret about what height the first jet was flying at is beginning to be revealed. Can you see what’s happening to that first contrail a little below the new one? This is a great test to see how far you’ve come as a CMJ (cloud maven junior)!
Here’s what happened in the Cirrocumulus cloud layer in yesterday’s special day, a pretty rare one, after the jets flew through it:
9:30 AM. OK, mystery’s over. Even the average CMJ Joe can see that 1) the jets were IN the Cirrocumulus cloud, and more importantly, the aircraft contrails consist of ice. Yes, that’s right, the passage of the aircraft has caused a phase change from liquid drops to ice crystals, a lot of them.
9:47 AM. Now those contrails are looking like real and icy Cirrus clouds. In this case they’re called “ice canals” but sometimes, when aircraft are ascending or descending and do this, they make round clear holes with ice in the middle, called “hole punch” clouds.
Lessons to be learned from yesterday’s supercooled clouds and the aircraft interactions inside them:
Cloud seeding works! You CAN make a supercooled, non-precipitating cloud produce a little precipitation that would not otherwise have occurred.
But in those situations where the clouds, say, are topping the Catalinas, they are often quite thin, and whether there is an economically worthwhile amount of precip is not known. However, an experiment targeting those clouds would be the perfect “baseline” one in cloud seeding to establish how much we can wring out of non-precipitating clouds. Things become kind of a mess when even randomized seeding takes on already precipitating clouds.
“Overseeding”, as here in these clouds when aircraft produce prolific numbers of ice crystals in a small volume, it leads to tiny ice crystals with low fallspeeds. Sure, they fall out and leave a hole, but they virtually never reach the ground except in one a in billion cases when the very cold clouds are real low, practically on the ground.
The Wegener-Bergeron-Findeisen mechanism produces precipitation.
Alfred Wegener, 1911, and later Bergeron3 and Findeisen in the 1930s, came up with the hypothesis that adding ice to a supercooled cloud results in the growth of the ice crystal at the expense of the droplets. They’ll tend to evaporate while ice is being added to the crystal via deposition of water vapor that was once liquid. So, an awful lot, maybe most of the precipitation that falls on earth, involves “mixed phase” clouds. This process has also been called the “cold rain process.”
However, let us not forget the two other processes that produce precipitation, the all ice process (no liquid required–helps produce “powder snow”, and the all liquid process, where cloud drops collide and grow into raindrops–the biggest measured drops in the world (about 1 cm in diameter) have formed soley through this process. It is likely that most of the rain that falls in tropical locations like the Hawaiian Islands and in hurricanes is due to this process even when ice is present in the top part of storms.
—————————————————-
Later, we had some Altocumulus castellanus clouds with virga as the moist level lowered, though they were long gone before they could provide us with a nice sunset:
2:32 PM Bands of Altocumulus castellanus approach Oro Valley from the west. These clouds, while based at just about the same level as the Cirrocumulus clouds earlier in the day had three things going for them to produce so much ice (right side of photo–and really, convert to Cirrus clouds). The cloud bases were slightly warmer (the TUS sounding suggests, -22 C), meaning more water was available to the cloud, something that would impact the drop sizes in the turrets of the Altocumulus clouds (left side of photo); 2) the tops were higher than the Cc clouds (ones that were paper thin) and therefore, slightly colder (probably about -28 C) than those of the Cc clouds, and perhaps as importantly, the drops near the top of the Ac turrets before they converted to ice, were larger than those in the earlier Cc clouds. The larger the droplets, the higher the temperature at which they freeze. So, ice is more likely to form in a cloud with larger droplets in it than one with tiny droplets in it even though they are the same temperature. That might explain the difference ice-forming behavior of yesterday’s very thin Cc clouds which mostly had no ice (until an aircraft came along in them) and these prolific ice-producing Altocumulus clouds, ones that converted to all ice. Just educated guesses here.
Still looking for scattered very light showers in the vicinity tomorrow as a Mr. Troughy goes by.
The End.
——————————————
1Through the oral history tradition I learned while viewing the Washington Husky meltdown2 at AZ stadium on Saturday from a Mr. Mark Albright that the Tucson weather balloon launch site has been moved from Davis-Monthan Airbase to the University of Arizona campus next to their weather department.
2Late in the proceedings, with about 2 min left and the Huskies starting a play, and in the lead, CM was visibly moved to jump up and say, “Don’t hand the ball off!”, as a gift to Arizona fumble occurred simultaneously. But, being bifurcated in his loyalties now that CM is in Arizona and not with the University of Washington, he had to be somewhat “glad” that the Cats maintained their somewhat suspect but great win-loss record.
3From the Historic Moments in Weather collection:
Your Catalina CM and Tor Bergeron meet for the first time in Goleta, CA, in 1968 at the headquarters of North American Weather Consultants. Yours for $2,100 dollars, today only. I remember thinking that his head was gigantic! No wonder he was so smart. CM, not so much.
Been away from you for a couple of days, wanting to see how you do on your own, perhaps see you grow in your cloud watching obsession, namely, that you want to name everything you see, as though you were Luke Howard himself. Hope you logged all cloud genera, varieties and species, 27 all told, over the past 48 h. You can bring your photo log books to the next meeting and CM will go over them with you.
Measurable rain chance still pretty reasonable for the window of Nov. 20-21st, too, as we have purported for some time here, but it will be pretty minimal.
The weather way ahead; a promise of substantial rains
However, as often happens, on the horizon is a substantial storm for Arizona, ones that have a habit of disappearing it seems as the foretold event gets closer. Here it is depicted below in plots from our cherished NOAA spaghetti factory:
Valid at 5 pm AST, December 2nd. Pretty cool, huh?Same spaghetti plot, annotated. Recall that these plots are ones where the model input has been deliberately errorized to see how big little errors make in the outcome of the model. Why do that? Because we know at the outset that our measurements are not perfect, and have all kinds of actual little errors in them. These plots are a way of seeing how robust a predicted pattern is, and those areas where the forecast is pretty reliable, is indicated by bunched lines (key contours of the airflow at 500 millibars, or around 18,000 feet above sea level in the mid-latitudes, lower near the poles, higher near the equator. Why do we use a pressure level instead of the pressure at a height? Go here. CM would like to see as well, in the 21st century, maps of constant altitude (3 km, 5 km, etc.) with the high and low pressures on them as we have on our sea level maps! Is anybody listening? (A google search just now could not locate, constant altitude pressure maps….)
While the above forecast of contours is two weeks away, and numerical models are often unreliable at those long horizons, we see that the red lines (not to be confused with political markers) have dipped down in great bunches over the extreme eastern Pac 12 Ocean, and continue all bunched up across Baja Cal and thence into Texas. In the plot above, the red lines represent a 500 mb height of 5760 meters, one that’s on the southern periphery of the jet stream. So, when its well south of us, our chances of rain are engorged. Recall, too, that the 5640 meter contour, just that bit lower in height, is associated with leading edge of rains in the central and southern California area–remember Brier and Panofsky, Some Applications of Statistics to Meteorology? Well, in that book you will learn that contour is what the LA weather service used to use as crib for when rain would occur in southern California.
I am sure you remember two things, maybe more than two. We have an El Nino in progress, not a great one, but an OK one, AND that El Niños strengthen the southern jet stream in the eastern Pac and across the southern latitudes to the east. So, we expect to see this pattern, one of a stronger jet stream in the sub-tropics carrying stronger disturbances as a result, evolving as the winter develops, that is, more disturbances in the lower latitude band of the jet stream (sub-tropical part). The plot above is a classic one for predicting that kind of regime, maybe with a bit of a split in the J-stream with northern and southern branches being pretty vigorous at this map time, and before, for that matter.
Valid at 5 AM AST, Monday, December 1st. Colored regions are those in which the model has calculated that precipitation has fallen in the prior 12 h.
The plot above, it has laid a foundation of credibility for what is show below, from IPS Meteostar’s rendering of our WRF-GFS forecast model output based on the 5 PM AST global data. It shows 24 h of substantial Arizona rains, including here in Catalinaland, at the beginning of December. You’d be pretty cool to inform your friends about this, ones who might be heading back somewhere after a TG visit to sunland1. (Besides, they won’t remember what you said anyway by the time December gets here.)
Valid at 5 PM AST, Monday, December 1st. Colored regions are those in which the model has calculated that precipitation has fallen in the prior 12 h.
Today’s clouds
Lots of pretty Cirrus.
The End
———————————-
1By the way, the Great Lakes are freezing over already, a month earlier than normal due to some astounding cold back there, so TG visitors from back East, upper Midwest, may look for reasons to stay longer. Well, at least until the rain and cold hit here.
Here we go…..some pretty, but also dull, photos, along with some novella-sized captions as mind wandered into the obtuse while writing them.
6:44 AM. Nice sunrise due to Altostratus/Cirrus ice clouds.2:00 PM. Kind of a dull day yesterday, kind of like this blog. Stratocumulus (Sc) clouds topped Samaniego Ridge most of the day, below that gray Altostratus ice cloud layer. But those Sc clouds were too warm to have ice in them, and droplets were too small to collide, stick together, and form misty drizzle. Have to get to at least 30 microns in diameter before they stick to one another. Misty drizzle? Could be a great name for a late night female vocalist doing earthy songs like Earthy Kitt back in the ’50s. “Earthy” was much hotter than global warming.3:29 PM. An Altostratus translucidus to opacus, mostly ice-cloud with a dark patch of Altocumulus droplet cloud blocking the sun. If you look closely, (upper center) you can see a that there’s this Altotratus layer may be topped by a Altocumulus perlucidus droplet cloud layer. Yes, droplet clouds at the top of As where the temperature is lowest? Yep, this counter-intuitive finding happens all the time, up to about -30 C -35 C. Been there, measured that; in aircraft research. Ma Nature likes to form a drop and have it freeze before forming an ice crystal directly from the water vapor.4:40 PM, shot taken as we entered a local restaurant. You’ve got your two layers of Altocumulus, with some Altostratus translucidus above those, filling in the gaps. Gaps? Huh. I am reminded that I have a failed manuscript about “gaps”, these kind; Cloud Seeding and the Journal Barriers to Faulty Claims: Closing the Gaps., rejected by the Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. way back in ’99. It was an instruction manual, in a sense, about how to prevent all the bogus cloud seeding literature that got published in the 1960s through 1980s, and was not only published, but cited by our highest national panels and experts, like the National Academy of Sciences. Amazing, but true. I give examples. You can read about this chapter of science in Cotton and Pielke, 2007, “Human Impacts on Weather and Climate”, Cambridge U. Press, a highly recommended book. That cloud seeding distortion of cloud seeding science was due to many factors, of which perhaps the primary one was, “nobody ever got a job saying cloud seeding doesn’t work1.” This was a great segue. Of course, we have similar stresses on those researchers looking for effects of global warming nee “climate change” now days. Nobody will ever get a job (a renewed grant) saying they can’t find evidence of global warming, “Can I have some more of that money to keep looking?” And beware the “Ides of March” if you criticize published work in that domain! Think of poor Judy C , a heroine to me, and how she’s been vilified for questioning climate things.
5:29 PM, took leave from Indian food there in R Vistoso for this. Its not just anyone who would excuse himself from dinner to do something other than visit the laboratory.
That’s about it. No use talking about the rain ahead again. Seems to be a couple chances between the 20th and the 30th.
The End
—————————-
1You can make a cloud snow a little by seeding it with dry ice or silver iodide. This has been shown since the earliest days of experiments. Below, to demonstrate this, an aircraft inadvertently “seeded” this Altocumulus cloud layer. However, whether the small amount that falls out from previously non-precipitating clouds is economically viable is not known. Increasing precipitation due to seeding when the clouds are already snowing/raining has not been satisfactorily proven. As prize-winning stat man, Jerzy Neyman, U of Cal Berkeley Golden Bears Stat Lab would tell you, you need a randomized experiment and followed by a second one that confirms the original results, with measurements made by those who have no idea what days are seeded and evaluations done by those who have no vested interest in cloud seeding. Wow there’s a lot of boring information here. Getting a little worked up here, too.
Ice canal in supercooled Altocumulus clouds over Seattle, bases -23 C, tops -25 C (from PIREPS). Photo by the Arthur.
Beginning where we left off in our last chapter….that rain foretold here by the (affectionately) US WRF-GOOFUS models back a few days ago for the 19-21st for us only remains a possibility if you’re Canadian:
Valid at 5 PM AST, November 19th. Rainy system strikes Cal, on doorstep to AZ. You got yer subtropical jet stream crashing into the coast over southern Cal, a nice low off SFO, and plenty of rain predicted as far south as Los Angeles.Valid at the SAME TIME as the Canadian GEM model above, 5 PM AST on the 19th of November! This is a horrible prediction by our own best model, because it robs us of our rain! For rain here in the cool season, we have to have the jet stream over or to the south of us here in Arizona, and here the jet stream is over Oregon! There is no low off Frisco, either! No “Waterworld1” here.Areas of rain predicted for the 6 h preceding 5 PM AST November 19th by the US WRF-GOOFUS model. The low pressure center, rather than off Frisco, is way up there by Annette Island! Or is maybe that one inland in B C.
So, with “model divergence” like this, what’s a poor meteorologist to do? Well, here, at least, we go with the Smokers1‘ version absolutely. Look for a chance of rain here in Catalina land on the 19th-21st window, as has been suggested here a few days ago, and for that reason alone we are “staying the course” as President’s like to say. We’re not here to give you necessarily the best forecast, but rather a consistent one. So, in conclusion, look for clouds and a chance of rain around the 20th. Furthermore, to maintain consistency and build confidence in the reader by avoiding the emotional distress caused by “fluctuating forecasts”, we might be forecasting rain right up until it doesn’t happen!
—–Temperature note, or “Egad!”———
Got an e-mail from local pal, Mark A., that the -27 F recorded in Wyoming a couple of days ago was the lowest temperature ever recorded in the State for the whole month of November! How could that be? It was only 12-13th of the month! Incredible. Weather, global warming or not, are truly amazing!
—————————————–
Yesterday’s clouds
Here are a couple shots of the Cirrus clouds we had yesterday and thge day before, so the header is not accurate. Not much going on lately, but those Cirrus clouds did make the sky pretty at times before racing off toward the eastern horizon.
6:39 AM November 12th. Cirrus clouds add color to the morning sunrise.9:46 AM. But which day? This is a surprise quiz for those aspiring to cloud mavenhood.
9:16 AM. Yesterday or the day before?
The End
————————————-
1Movie buffs of course, recall the great Kevin Costner movie, “Waterworld” and know that the villainous “Smokers” in that movie were Costner’s subtle nod to Canadians who smoke a lot. Pretty funny, really. I can’t believe all the pop culture information you get here! Its pretty incredible.
1I put in a second “1” footnote in case you missed the first one.
Data, except for the past summer, are from Our Garden down there near Stallion and Columbus. That last data point is from Sutherland Heights.
The End, except for what’s below.
Fall in the Sonoran Desert (the season)
These shots below from hikes/horsey rides on Friday and yesterday, FYI. Seemed a little greener than usual for this time of year probably due to those September and early October rains. I think you should hike or ride a horse/bike out there in the Catalina Mountains before the rains hit. Yeah, that’s right; its gonna rain in November1.
The End
——————–
1Assertion subject to error. But check THIS out, from last evening’s run at 11 PM AST which I just now saw at 7:46 AM:
Valid at 11 AM AST Thursday, November 20th! Note “storm face” complete with eyes and a frown.
This was pretty neat, this forecast map from yesterday’s 11 AM AST WRF-“GOOFUS” (GFS) run. Look at all the rain barging into Arizona and Catalina!
Plenty of rain here in southern California AND Arizona! Valid at 11 AM November 20th.
What’s remarkable is that the ensemble runs made yesterday’s prediction of rain, one discussed here, quite the “outlier” of the rest of the “members” of the spaghetti plots, so one wouldn’t be expecting to see any rain for Catalina again!
But, here was that rain again, and this whole storm complex along the California coast falling mostly within that time period where over the decades there has been a tendency for storms to strike the more southerly locations between the 10 and 20th of November, something that was mentioned yesterday as a bit of a conundrum. Rain, though not as much, was shown again in the next run based on 5 PM AST global data, and due to that prediction of less rain, I am not showing it.
Below is a comparison of how the ensemble outputs (shown as “spaghetti” plots of a couple of key contours at 500 mb (around 18,000 feet above sea level) have changed since yesterday. To this observer, its been an unusually large change in where the grouping of those key contours are in just 24 h (they always change some, of course).
Notice how the blue (contours of flow pretty much in the heart of the jet stream) and red lines (periphery of it) have been shifted 10 degrees latitude and more southward from the first plot to the second, latest spaghetti plot, indicating that we’re going to be more in the storm track at that time, and the likelihood of a rain threat on the 19th-20th is more credible, less subjectively based as was yesterday’s take. Maybe subjectivity in forecasting isn’t that bad afterall…
Valid at 5 PM, Wednesday November 19th. Note how the red and blue lines bulge northward along the West Coast, suggesting a fair weather pattern.
Also valid at 5 PM AST, Wednesday November 19th. Blue lines (contours along which the wind blows from left to right) are now much farther south, and the red lines are now so far south they’re almost not in the map domain. Also, those red lines now do not bulge northward anymore, but rather are suggesting a broad trough along the West Coast at lower latitudes, completely different than the plots just 24 h earlier.
Finally found some rain for you. Took awhile. Came from the 11 PM AST global data from last night using the WRF-GFS model, our best. The rain falls around the 19th, “only” 11 days from now and during the “sweet spot” for southern California rain in mid-November, 10-20th, which gives it a few more percent of credibility than it otherwise would have.
BTW, there is virtually no support for this pattern from the NOAA spaghetti factory. So, all of the discussion below about an upcoming rain in Catalina might erroneous, based on a personal hunch about an outlier model run being the correct “solution”, one based on experience, and to HELL with spaghetti1, a study in forecasting subjectivity, etc.
Got that Bay Area rain timing info originally from C. Donald Ahrens, the big author of Meteorology Today and Essentials of Meteorology, both of which have about 400 editions out by now, while he and I were at San Jose State College University.
Don, a grad student then, and me, and undergrad, worked and sang together to Top 40 songs radiating from KGO-FM 2,3 in a little corrugated metal building there by the San Jose State football stadium back in the late 60s, and it was somewhere between songs that he told me about his findings.
Don had done a rain frequency study for the Bay Area for a local insurance company and it turned out that he found that it was somewhat more likely to rain in the middle of November than earlier or later in the month. That rain fell more more often than earlier was no surprise, but more often than later in the month was. Later I found that it was also true for southern California.
Sometimes oddities like these are referred to by big professors of weather, like Reid Bryson at the U of Wisconsin Badgers, as “singularities”, a weather pattern that tends to recur year after year around the same time of the year, like the so-called “January thaw” in the East which I don’t think happened last year.
So, ever since Don told me about the mid-November peak of rain in the central and southern parts of Cal, I have looked for it year after year and it seems to turn out quite often, and this November seems to be no exception, though the models were resisting this pattern for quite awhile before “giving in.”
Well, anyway where was I? It seems that the southern California rain is now being foretold for around 18th of November, and a day or so later it trudges on into Arizona. From IPS MeteoStar, a Sutron Company, whatever that is, this wonderful map:
Valid the night of November 19th-20th. Colored regions denote those areas where the model thinks it has precipitated during the PRIOR 12 h. So, storm has arrived here during the day on the 19th.
Some clouds
we have known over the past few weeks while CM was re-hydrating mentally:
Some ice for you on a warm fall day.Some ice for you on a warm fall day (virga from Altocumulus castellanus and or floccus)Pretty iridescence (or irisation) in a Cirrocumulus cloud.Pretty sunset, Altocumulus featured.
The End
—————————-
11The non-supportive spaghetti plot from the 00 Z (5 PM model run from last evening):
Valid at 5 PM AST Wednesday, November 19th. Arizona is in a low amplitude ridge, according to most of the “members” of the repeat model runs with itty-bitty errors deliberately put into them. I have rejected this plot and look for validation of this action around the 19th of November. You will not hear about it further if I am erroneous in this action!
2An odd, almost mysterious Frisco FM radio station with no commercials featuring, “Brother John.” We’d sing along to the Four Seasons, The Five Americans’, “Western Union” (about telegraph, the way people used to communicate before the Internet).
3 We both had quite a talent for falsetto it seemed at the time.
While living the big western life yesterday by riding a horse, me and my ridin’ pal, Nora B., came across some water flowing in the Sutherland Wash by the rusty gate on the east side of the wash that leads to Coronado National Forest land.
So, with with a 3-5 inch rain on the Catalinas, there WAS some water in the Sutherland here in the Catalina area. It was remarkable that there was no sign whatsoever of water having flowed at the Cottonwoods at the Baby Jesus Trail head on the north side of this flow (shown below), but water was flowing in it a few hundred yards farther downstream.
Nor was there any sign that water had flowed from our big rain in the Sutherland Wash at the back gate to Catalina State Park. In fact, we saw where this Sutherland Wash water disappeared just down from the rusty gate.
So, a lesson has been learned here about wash water flows: it can be flowing modestly between two dry points. Huh. Might not see this again for some time, and it will all be going away soon. Too bad so many of us have to pass hiking or horseback riding to these rare scenes today due to a necessary Pac 12 football TEEVEE vigil beginning just after 12 noon today and lasting through midnight I think. Kind of sad when you have to make choices between two equally worthy activities like these.
Cloudwise, I hope you logged the occurrence of distant Cumulonimbus clouds in the high country on the NW-NE horizon late yesterday afternoon.
The End.
9:18 AM. The Sutherland Wash near the rusty gate.9:54 AM. The apparent source of the water, the tributary Big Rock creek a few hundred yards south of the Baby Jesus trail head at the Cottonwoods.
The “perfect storm”? Well, maybe the perfect rain, and it kept giving fro several hours yesterday after our best model said it should end yesterday before 11 AM. And what a nice rain! 1.18 inches total here in Sutherland Heights, as measured by a CoCoRahs plastic 4 inch gauge. (You might consider getting one, btw, or one from the U of A’s rainlog.org)
Went down to the CDO and Sutherland Washes to see what was up after seeing the gargantuan 4.96 inch total on Ms. Lemmon, and the 3.62 inches at the Samaniego Peak gauge. Below is the resul for the Sutherland, both were the same, nary a drop in them:
8:15 AM. Looking upstream in the Sutherland Wash at the back gate of Catalina State Park. I could hardly believe that there was no flow with so much rain having fallen in Catalinas! But it was good in a sense; all that rain mostly soaked in.
6:37 AM. A photo of drizzle falling from Stratocumulus clouds. Hope you got out and jumped around in our rare drizzle occurrence. Big hat, no bicycle, works in drizzle, too, the tiny drops won’t get on your glasses. Note how uniform the fuzziness is toward Catalina/Oro Valley, only gradually thickens to the left. Took about 2 h to get a hundredth when this was going on.
7:23 AM. Drizzle drops as seen by your car’s windshield after about 1 sec at 1 mph. Note how close together they are. The tiny drops and how close together they are is what differentiates true drizzle from the phony labeling of spares large drops as “drizzle” we sometimes get from our TEEVEEs by semi-pro meteorologists. Sorry to bang on them again, but REALLY, folks, they should know better. Sure, I’m a drizzle-head, but it really does matter since its a whole different process that produces drizzle compared to sparse large drops. Sorry, too, for another mini-harangue on this, but REALLY folks, we should know the difference! Feeling better now, got that out.
8:02 AM. Heading down to the Sutherland Wash on Golder Ranch Drive with temperatures and dewpoints in the mid-60s, there really was a feel for being on the wet side of the Hawaiian Islands, maybe above Hilo, HI, at 3,000 feet elevation, except for the dead grasses.10:20 AM. One of the many dramatic scenes yestserday, this one looking toward the Charouleau Gap NE of Catalina.10:19 AM. While it was nice to see all the water glinting off the rocks on the side of Samaniego Ridge, a deeply troubling aspect was the amount of aerosol that had moved in suddenly it seemed, evident in the crespuscular rays. How could it be this dirty so soon? Seems like a weather oxymoron after such a long period of rain. Also, one wondered if this aerosol loading would stop the warm rain process by providing too many, and smaller droplets in our clouds. Fortunately, that did not happen, and what appeared to be warm rain events, or ice formation at relatively high temperatures in our clouds, also requiring extra large cloud droplets, for the most part, continued intermittently into mid-afternoon.
10:32 AM. Close up of aerosols and sun glints on wet rocks.
12:23 PM. Glimpse of ice-forming top (smooth region above crinkly top). Types of crystals visible here? Needles and hollow sheaths because the top temperature was likely equal to or warmer than -10 C (14 F) and cooler than -4 C, and that is the temperature range that those crystals form under when there is water saturation, as there is in a Cumulus turret before it glaciates. OK, a lot of hand waving, but that’s what I think and I am here mainly to tell you what to think, too.
5:36 PM. The day ended quietly with a little, but pretty scruff of orographic Stratocumulus castellanus on Sam Ridge, the clouds mashed down by the subsiding air at the rear of our little trough that went by yesterday afternoon.
The weather WAY ahead, too far ahead to even speculate about:
NOAA spaghetti plots still suggesting a pretty good chance of rain here around the 23-25th of this month. Nothing before then.
Looked for a time that the rain might be over by mid-afternoon and early evening here in Catalina with only a disappointing 0.40 inches here, but the rains kept coming overnight, piling up a nice 0.98 inches 24 h total for the storm. In the meantime, Ms. Mt. Lemmon has gotten 4.29 inches! Check out these eye-popping totals from the Pima County network, ending at 7 AM AST today (just updated. These are so great in view of last October’s trace of rain:
Gauge 15 1 3 6 24 Name Location
ID# minutes hour hours hours hours
—- —- —- —- —- —- —————– ———————
Catalina Area
1010 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.71 Golder Ranch Horseshoe Bend Rd in Saddlebrooke
1020 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.28 1.06 Oracle Ranger Stati approximately 0.5 mi SW of Oracle
1040 0.00 0.08 0.12 0.43 0.94 Dodge Tank Edwin Rd 1.3 mi E of Lago Del Oro Parkway
1050 0.00 0.16 0.20 0.67 1.26 Cherry Spring approximately 1.5 mi W of Charouleau Gap
1060 0.04 0.16 0.20 0.83 1.93 Pig Spring approximately 1.1 mi NE of Charouleau Gap
1070 0.00 0.08 0.20 0.59 1.14 Cargodera Canyon NE corner of Catalina State Park
1080 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.91 CDO @ Rancho Solano Cañada Del Oro Wash NE of Saddlebrooke
1100 0.00 0.12 0.28 0.55 1.06 CDO @ Golder Rd Cañada Del Oro Wash at Golder Ranch Rd
Santa Catalina Mountains
1030 0.00 0.04 0.08 0.55 1.57 Oracle Ridge Oracle Ridge, approximately 1.5 mi N of Rice Peak
1090 0.08 0.31 0.67 1.42 4.96 Mt. Lemmon Mount Lemmon
1110 0.04 0.12 0.12 0.71 1.61 CDO @ Coronado Camp Cañada Del Oro Wash 0.3 mi S of Coronado Camp
1130 0.00 0.24 0.47 1.89 3.46 Samaniego Peak Samaniego Peak on Samaniego Ridge
1140 0.04 0.12 0.24 0.39 1.73 Dan Saddle Dan Saddle on Oracle Ridge
2150 0.08 0.12 0.28 1.14 3.50 White Tail Catalina Hwy 0.8 mi W of Palisade Ranger Station
2280 0.00 0.04 0.12 0.31 1.93 Green Mountain Green Mountain
2290 0.04 0.08 0.20 0.75 2.40 Marshall Gulch Sabino Creek 0.6 mi SSE of Marshall Gulch
Misty drizzle with very low visibilities is still falling here in Sutherland Heights, Catalina, at 3 AM. The Catalina Mountains are not visible from just a couple of miles away. This suggests the clouds overhead are now “clean and shallow” and rain is forming via collisions of cloud drops with coalescence rather than because of ice in the overhead clouds, often called “warm rain,” a rare occurrence in Arizona. You’ll definitely want to log this in your cloud diary!
“Clean” means that the clouds have low droplet concentrations, viz., are not choked with anthro and natural “continental” aerosols but are more “maritime”, almost oceanic in composition, something that easily leads to “warm rain/drizzle” formation. In oceanic clouds far from pollution sources droplet concenrations usually are less than 100 cm-3. They average about 60 cm-3 in Cumulus clouds in onshore flow along the Washington coast, as an example. Cloud appearance should look a little different to the discerning eye, too. With low droplet concentrations, the clouds appear “softer” than usual, not a hard.
Normally, our clouds likely have a few hundred per cm-3 or more and appear darker from below since higher droplet concentrations is also associated with bouncing more sunlight off the top of the cloud1.
With vort max (aka, curly, or curling, air) still well to the west of us at this time (3 AM AST) as seen here. This sat imagery also shows plenty of shallow clouds upwind of us, so it seems like the very light rain and drizzle will continue well into the morning, likely adding a few more hundredths to our generous totals. Remember that the air likes to slide upward as curly air approaches, that is, produce a lot clouds, and today, a last bit of precip. Did pretty good last night, too!
Honestly, you really want to get out and experience our misty, drizzly rain (drop sizes mostly between 200 and 500 microns in diameter; a few human hair widths), before it ends; the kind of precipitation that makes riding a bicycle even with a big hat impossible. You might even try the near impossible trick of photographing the drizzle drops, too, as they land in puddles, see if you can catch the tiny disturbance made by drizzle drops. That would be great photo! I know, too, that experiencing real drizzle will give you a bit of a chuckle as you think of all those less informed folks, some of whom are even on TEEVEE, who call a sparse fall of raindrops, “drizzle.” Oh, my, WHAT has happened to our weather education?!
Yesterday’s clouds
Lots of gray cloud scenery yesterday, including a stunning example of Nimbostratus (Ns), the steady rainmaker (at least here we had that, anyway.) In other places, Cumulonimbus clouds were also contained within that rainy cloud mass and dumping an inch or so in an hour in TUS with LTG (weather text for “lightning2“), as you likely know. Didn’t hear thunder here, but coulda happened since I was off to the new Whole Foods market at Ina and Oracle as the steady rain from Ns moved in it because it said online that they had Brother Bru Bru’s African Hot Sauce which I had been looking for for a long time but when I got there they didn’t have it! The grocery manager apologized profusely and then we started talking about haloes and the ice crystals that cause them. So, you never know when your cloud mavenhood will come in handy in everyday conversations, maybe make that friend you’ve been looking for:
7:14 AM. The many layered remnants and distant rain creeping toward Catalina from the southwest are evident soon after dawn
7:34 AM. New round of rain begins on the Catalinas. Shafting here implies mounding cumuliform turrets on top, likely glaciating. From up there they would probably look like soft Cumulonimbus capillatus clouds, ones with weak updrafts.
8:34 AM. One of the prettiest sights around here can be just a tiny little cloud (Stratus fractus) like this one when a glint of sun falls upon it. It looked so CUTE! Imagine, you could be up on that little knob and run in and out of it, maybe play hide and seek with your friends, except that being a “clean” cloud, the visibility would be pretty good inside it, not like the shallow, impenetrable fogs you sometimes get around Bakersfield, CA. There, in one of those, you could play really great hide and seek! I’m guessing that if you’re reading this far, you may not have a lot of friends. :}1:23 PM. In the midst of our mid-day light rain, a clear example of Nimbostratus with underlying Stratus fractus and Stratocumulus. Remember, its not the LOW clouds that are raining, its the deep Ns layer above them. However, it is OFTEN true that the lower clouds ADD to the rain because as the rain falls from the Ns layer, those drops often collide with the floating drops in the lower clouds thus making a raindrop bigger. That’s one main reason why rain and snow are so much more on the upslope side of mountains just due to that collection of non-precipitating cloud drops! Its so cool! Away from mountains, you likely won’t have so many low clouds at the bottom of Ns, and the rain is less.
2:50 PM. After the rain ended, suddenly this lower cloud line formed representing a wind puff from the west. It headed toward the Catalinas, but then, within a few minutes, pooped out with no precip having fallen out. It was quite a bit fatter before this photo, too. That dissipation indicated that whatever wind source had produced had died out. But anyway, when you see a cloud line like this, think “windshift.”
4:57 PM. Expansive deck of Stratocumulus with spots of very light rain in the distance promises, along with the curly air feature (an upper level vortex) being so far to the west of us at this point, promises that the rain is not over.
The weather way ahead
Dry for almost two weeks. However, a crazy NOAA spaghetti factory plot suggests rain in about two weeks, around the 23-25th, as you can plainly see here:
NOAA spaghetti factory plot (aka, “Lorenz plot”, after chaos scientist, Edward N. Lorenz–he would really like THIS plot!) valid for 5 PM AST Oct 23rd. Rain is hinted at by the loopy lines in Arizona dipping down to the south. Will keep you posted on that, but not very often.
The End. Its really amazing how much information I have passed along today! Most of it correct, too!
——————————————————————-
cCoCoRahs gauge, not Davis tipping bucket which seems to have a problem of late.
1This is the concept behind kooky schemes to defeat potential global warming which hasn’t happened for 18 years or so by polluting oceanic clouds, making them “brighter” on top, darker on the bottom by inserting extra aerosols into them. Ghastly thought! Haven’t we polluted enough?
2Recall that weathermen and women were WAY out in front when it came to what we now call “texting”, as in “2KOLD4me” that kind of thing.
Let me give you an example from the 50s when we were rocking around the clock: “M8BKN15OVC2R-F68/661713G24989 R-OCNLY R”, a text phrase that would take a paragraph to unravel, to paraphrase language maven, Noam C3,4., except in those days we had our own private symbols which I can’t duplicate for “BKN” (a circle with two vertical parallel lines in it) and “OVC” (a circle with a plus sign in it). Weather typewriters and teletypes came with those private symbols!
3Wow, a footnote in a bunch of footnotes! Breaking ground again I think! What Noam C. said: “takes a phrase to tell a lie; a paragraph to unravel it.”
4Factoid, one not having to do with weather: Language maven, NC, really liked Pol Pot and his “restructuring” of society back then until he learned about all the millions of skulls were piling up along with that “restructuring.” You can hear about Pol Pot (and hypocrisy) here in Holiday in Cambodia, one of the defining songs of the 1980s IMO, as interpreted by The Dead Kennedys featuring lead singer, Jello Biafra. (You remember Jello don’t you? Ran for president a while back. Kind of surprised we didn’t elect him…)
